Question

In: Accounting

You have decided to use positive confirmations as a substantive audit test of accounts receivable. Assume...

You have decided to use positive confirmations as a substantive audit test of accounts receivable. Assume you have selected balances to confirm from your client’s accounts receivable subsidiary ledger at year-end and you have sent letters directly to customers based on these selections. Answer and clearly explain each of the following: A.) What is a positive confirmation? B.) Is this a vouching or tracing test? C.) What will you do if no response is received from a customer? Be specific.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A. External confirmations is one of the substantive audit procedure to get sufficent and appropriate audit evidence regarding the balnaces of account receivable

There are 2 types of external confirmations they are :-

1. Positive confirmation

2. Negative confirmation

Positive confirmation :- a request that the confirming party responds directly to the auditor indicating whether the confirming party agrees or disagrees withthe information in the request,or providing the required information.

B.

Tracing :- it refers to first selecting n accounting transaction and then foloowing it into a ledger or journal. The direction of testing in this case from source document to journal or ledger and test whether transaction that occurred are recorded in the accounting records.

Vouching :- it refers to first selecting of an item from accounting records like journal or ledger and then examining the underlying source document. Thus, the direction of from journals or ledgers back to the source document.vouchung provides that evidence that items included in the accounting journal or ledgers have occured.

In the given auditing procedure of positive confirmation, the direction of verification is from accounting journals or ledgers to the source document. first we select the balances of the account receivable and then we send the positive confirmation for the response of the account receivable.

Hence, it is vouching.

C. If there is no response for positive confirmation :-

Then based on the materiality of the amount involved with thta particular account receivable we them follow up with aa second and sometimes a third request to those who donot respond. Where the auditor is unable to obtain response, the auditor should use the alternative procedure.

these are all information and explanations required to solve the above given questions.

if there is any clarification required regarding the above provided answer, please mention them in comment box.

I hope, all the above mentioned information explanations are useful and helpful to you.

Thank you.


Related Solutions

Describe the use of and process of Accounts Receivable Confirmations Describe what a Positive Confirmation is...
Describe the use of and process of Accounts Receivable Confirmations Describe what a Positive Confirmation is Describe what a negative confirmation is
Required information Accounts Receivable Confirmations Read the case and answer the questions that follow. Audit standards...
Required information Accounts Receivable Confirmations Read the case and answer the questions that follow. Audit standards require analytical procedures at two stages during the audit: at the risk assessment (planning) phase and again at the end of the audit. They are optionally used as a substantive procedure during the course of an audit. CONCEPT REVIEW: Often times it does not seem to be productive or effective for auditors to send accounts receivable confirmations, yet the standards require it. It is...
Required information Accounts Receivable Confirmations Read the case and answer the questions that follow. Audit standards...
Required information Accounts Receivable Confirmations Read the case and answer the questions that follow. Audit standards require analytical procedures at two stages during the audit: at the risk assessment (planning) phase and again at the end of the audit. They are optionally used as a substantive procedure during the course of an audit. CONCEPT REVIEW: Often times it does not seem to be productive or effective for auditors to send accounts receivable confirmations, yet the standards require it. It is...
Required information Accounts Receivable Confirmations Read the case and answer the questions that follow. Audit standards...
Required information Accounts Receivable Confirmations Read the case and answer the questions that follow. Audit standards require analytical procedures at two stages during the audit: at the risk assessment (planning) phase and again at the end of the audit. They are optionally used as a substantive procedure during the course of an audit. CONCEPT REVIEW: Often times it does not seem to be productive or effective for auditors to send accounts receivable confirmations, yet the standards require it. It is...
Edwards has decided to use monetary-unit sampling in the audit of an entity’s accounts receivable balance....
Edwards has decided to use monetary-unit sampling in the audit of an entity’s accounts receivable balance. Few, if any, misstatements of account balance overstatements are expected. (8 points) a. Calculate the sample size and the sampling interval Edwards should use for the following information: Tolerable misstatement = $15,000 Expected misstatement = $6,000 Desired confidence level = 95% Recorded amount of accounts receivable balance $300,000 b. Calculate the upper misstatement limit (UML) assuming that the following three misstatements were discovered in...
Substantive Test Assume that you are now performing substantive tests on receivables and you want to...
Substantive Test Assume that you are now performing substantive tests on receivables and you want to perform account receivable confirmations. The client’s recorded book value is $2,300,000 made up of 2,650 customers. You have established a tolerable misstatement of $75,000 for accounts receivable. You have selected 200 accounts worth a total of $235,000 to confirm and after sending out the confirmations, four are returned showing the following overstatements. Book Value Audit value Sonic Trading            12,800 10,350 Bazaar Enterprises       8,300 6,500...
The auditors wish to test the valuation of accounts receivable in the audit of Kaplan Corporation....
The auditors wish to test the valuation of accounts receivable in the audit of Kaplan Corporation. The client has $1,050,000 of total recorded receivables, composed of 1,900 accounts. Use Figure 9-13 to determine the reliability factor. The auditors have decided to use structured nonstatistical sampling and have determined the following: Tolerable misstatement $42,000 Assessment of inherent and control risk Moderate Risk related to other substantive procedures Moderate Required: a. Calculate the required sample size. (Roundup to the next whole number.)...
COUNTRY: USA!! For the following liability accounts, propose a substantive audit procedure (either an analytical test...
COUNTRY: USA!! For the following liability accounts, propose a substantive audit procedure (either an analytical test or a test of details) to test the year end balance of the following various liability accounts listed below. As an example - to audit the liability account mortgage interest payable at year-end, you would check to see when the last interest payment was, and then based upon the loan balance and interest rate and the number of days to year-end, you could compute...
You have been assigned to audit the sales and accounts receivable balances of Coppero Engineering Ltd....
You have been assigned to audit the sales and accounts receivable balances of Coppero Engineering Ltd. for the year ended September 30, 2020. Coppero Engineering is a major manufacturer of steel parts and fixtures for other manufacturers in the engineering field. The interim work was undertaken in June 2020 and tests indicated that internal controls over sales and accounts receivable are effective and that therefore control risks are acceptable. You observe that credit sales are made to a group of...
Assume you have performed control tests for a continuing audit client and decided that control risk...
Assume you have performed control tests for a continuing audit client and decided that control risk must be increased from the prior year due to changes in the type of transactions being processed. Assuming no change in the client’s inherent risk, what is the implication for the substantive procedures you will need to perform? How will this keep audit risk at an acceptable level? Explain and be specific.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT