In: Finance
Use the information below for questions 37-40
Rocky Mountain Brewery has done an analysis of whether to
continue offering a new product or
to halt operations for $250,000. The new product has expected sales
at the end of this year of
$800,000 and this will continue for two years after that (3 years
total). This product has created
some cannibalization worth $100,000 of sales reduction each year.
COGS is $200,000 per year
and COGS related to the cannibalized product is $60,000 each year.
Based on this analysis the
sales and COGS values will stay consistent for this upcoming
year-end and the next two years.
Interest charges are $70,000 annually. The corporate tax rate is
25%. The equipment cost for the
project is $1,000,000 and was spent at the beginning of this year
(t=0) and it has a 40% CCA
rate. Assume that at the end of year 3 the equipment is sold for $0
and does not bring any tax
consequences.
37. What is the PV of the CCA tax shield?
a. $92,349
b. $100,797
c. $142,583
d. $145,658
38. What is the Net Income in year 3?
a. $270,000
b. $306,000
c. $292,000
d. $276,000
Accounts receivable are expected to account for 7% and accounts
payable are expected to
account for 8% of COGS. The networking capital will be recovered at
the end of year 3. The
firm demands a 12% return on projects such as this.
39. What is the NPV of the new product introduction?
a. $18,014
b. $176,070
c. $136,070
d. $144,109
40. A comparable company for this product, Foothills Brewery Ltd.,
had EBIT of $40,000,
50,000 and 60,000 for the end of this year and the following two
years (years as above).
Depreciation incorporated into each year’s EBIT is $300,000. The
appropriate CCA rate
was also 40% on a $1M investment, there do not have an interest
expense and the tax rate
was also 25%. How would you adjust the values in year 2 to receive
net income that you
are able to compare to the Rocky Mountain Brewery net income in
year 2? That is, what
is the NI in year 2 for the Foothills Brewery Ltd.?
a. $22,500
b. $20,900
c. -$45,500
d. $33,200
Year | Depn. | Book value | Tax shield | PV of Tax shield |
1 | 2=Prev.3*40% | 3=Prev.3-current depn.) | 4=2*25% | 5=4/1.12^Yr.n |
0 | 1000000 | |||
1 | 200000 | 800000 | 50000 | 44642.86 |
2 | 320000 | 480000 | 80000 | 63775.51 |
3 | 192000 | 288000 | 48000 | 34165.45 |
142583.82 |
Note: Yr. 1 depn. Is 50% of 40% *1000000 |
ANSWER: c. |
37.PV of the CCA tax shield= $ 142583 |
38 & 39 Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Sales | 800000 | 800000 | 800000 | ||
Cannibalised sales | -100000 | -100000 | -100000 | ||
COGS | -200000 | -200000 | -200000 | ||
COGS saved | 60000 | 60000 | 60000 | ||
Depn. | -200000 | -320000 | -192000 | ||
EBIT | 360000 | 240000 | 368000 | ||
Tax at 25% | -90000 | -60000 | -92000 | ||
Net income | 270000 | 180000 | 276000 | Ans.-38 | |
Add back; depn. | 200000 | 320000 | 192000 | ||
1.Operating cash flow | 470000 | 500000 | 468000 | ||
2.Cost of eqpt. | -1000000 | ||||
Net working capital | |||||
Accounts receivable(7%*(-200000+60000)) | -9800 | ||||
Accounts payable(-8%*(-200000+60000)) | 11200 | ||||
3.Net NWC | 1400 | -1400 | |||
4.Total annual FCFs(1+2+3) | -998600 | 470000 | 500000 | 466600 | |
5.PV F at 12%(1/1.12^Yr.n) | 1 | 0.89286 | 0.79719 | 0.71178 | |
6.PV at 12%(4*5) | -998600 | 419642.86 | 398596.94 | 332116.66 | |
7.NPV (sum of row 6) | 151756.46 | Ans.39 |
40.. | ||||
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
EBIT | 40000 | 50000 | 60000 | |
Tax at 25% | -10000 | -12500 | -15000 | |
Net income | 30000 | 37500 | 45000 |