In: Accounting
Data--- December 1 was the start of the company’s operations. The company had no operations prior to December 1.
During December, the first month of operation--
1. Direct materials added to production totaled $55,500.
2. Direct labor costs incurred/added to production totaled $82,600.
3. Manufacturing overhead costs added to production totaled $119,000.
4. 10,000 units were 100% complete and transferred to the next department.
5. 5,000 physical units were in ending Work in Process.
6. Each unit in ending WIP inventory was 100% complete with respect to materials costs and 80% complete with respect to conversion costs.
Question -- Is the weighted average being used in this example or is FIFO being used is this example? Please explain.
--Since the question data mentions this being 'first month of operation', the fact whether FIFO is being used or Weighted Average method is being used does not make any difference.
--Everything, (Equivalent units, Cost per Equivalent units, Cost transferred out and Cost of ending Inventory) would all BE SAME under Weighted Average Method as well as FIFO Method. This is because there is no beginning WIP Inventory (first month).
--Under FIFO method, Equivalent units calculation considers the beginning inventory as well. Since there is no beginning inventory, the result by FIFO and Weighted Average would be same.
--It can be solved by either Weighted Average or FIFO method.
EUP - FIFO Method |
Units |
% Material |
EUP Materials |
% Conversion |
EUP - Conversion |
Units of ENDING WIP |
5,000 |
100.0% |
5,000 |
80.0% |
4,000 |
Units STARTED & COMPLETED |
10,000 |
100% |
10,000 |
100% |
10,000 |
Units of beginning WIP |
- |
0.00% |
- |
30% |
- |
Equivalent Units of Production |
15,000 |
14,000 |
|||
COST per EUP |
Material |
Conversion |
|||
Cost incurred this period |
$ 55,500.00 |
$ 201,600.00 |
|||
Total Costs |
Costs |
$ 55,500.00 |
Costs |
$ 201,600.00 |
|
Equivalent units of production |
EUP |
15,000 |
EUP |
14,000 |
|
Cost per EUP |
$ 3.7000 |
$ 14.4000 |
|||
COST ASSIGNMENT & RECONCILIATION |
|||||
Cost Transferred out: |
EUP |
Cost per EUP |
Total Cost |
||
Cost of Beginning WIP |
- |
||||
Cost to complete beginning WIP- |
|||||
- Direct Materials |
- |
3.70 |
- |
||
- Conversion |
- |
14.40 |
- |
||
Total cost to complete beginning WIP |
- |
||||
Cost of Units started & completed this period: |
EUP |
Cost per EUP |
Total Cost |
||
- Direct Materials |
10,000.00 |
3.70 |
37,000.00 |
||
- Conversion |
10,000.00 |
14.40 |
144,000.00 |
||
Total costs started & Completed this period |
181,000.00 |
||||
Total cost of work finished this period |
181,000.00 |
||||
Costs of Ending WIP: |
EUP |
Cost per EUP |
Total Cost |
||
- Direct Materials |
5,000 |
$ 3.70 |
$ 18,500.00 |
||
- Conversion |
4,000 |
$ 14.40 |
$ 57,600.00 |
||
Total cost of ending WIP |
$ 76,100.00 |
||||
Total costs accounted for |
$ 257,100.00 |
EUP - Weighted Average Method |
Units |
% Material |
EUP Materials |
% Conversion |
EUP - Conversion |
Units TRANSFERRED |
10,000 |
100% |
10,000 |
100% |
10,000 |
Units of ENDING WIP |
5,000 |
100% |
5,000 |
80% |
4,000 |
Equivalent Units of Production |
15,000 |
14,000 |
|||
COST per EUP |
Material |
Conversion |
|||
Cost of Beginning WIP |
$ - |
$ - |
|||
Cost incurred during the period |
$ 55,500.00 |
$ 201,600.00 |
|||
Total Costs |
Costs |
$ 55,500.00 |
Costs |
$ 201,600.00 |
|
Equivalent units of production |
EUP |
15,000 |
EUP |
14,000 |
|
Cost per EUP |
$ 3.70000 |
$ 14.40000 |
|||
TOTAL COST ACCOUNTED FOR |
|||||
Cost of Units Transferred Out |
EUP |
Cost per EUP |
Total Cost |
||
- Direct Materials |
10,000 |
$ 3.70 |
$ 37,000.00 |
||
- Conversion |
10,000 |
$ 14.40 |
$ 144,000.00 |
||
Total Cost transferred Out |
$ 181,000.00 |
||||
Cost of ending WIP |
EUP |
Cost per EUP |
Total Cost |
||
- Direct Materials |
5,000 |
$ 3.70 |
$ 18,500.00 |
||
- Conversion |
4,000 |
$ 14.40 |
$ 57,600.00 |
||
Total cost of ending WIP |
$ 76,100.00 |
||||
Total costs accounted for |
$ 257,100.00 |