In: Finance
Period | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | PBP | NPV | IRR |
Project A | $ (1,000,000) | $ 200,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 400,000 | |||
Project B | $ (1,000,000) | $ 500,000 | $ 500,000 | $ 500,000 | |||||||||||
Project C | $ (80,000) | $ 1,040 | $ 9,456 | $ 11,405 | $ 18,567 | $ 47,453 | $ 6,394 | $ 45,727 | $ 51,933 | $ 85,625 | |||||
Project D | $ (400,000) | $ 4,161 | $ 37,824 | $ 45,618 | $ 74,269 | $ 189,812 | $ 25,577 | $ 182,907 | $ 207,733 | $ 342,499 | |||||
Project E | $ (17,000) | $ 16,000 | $ 16,000 | $ (16,000) | $ 16,000 | $ (52,000) | |||||||||
Project F | $ (5,000) | $ 2,000 | $ 2,000 | $ 2,000 | $ 2,000 | $ 2,000 | |||||||||
Project G | $ (5,000) | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ 15,000 | |||||||||
Project H | $ (20,000) | $ 7,000 | $ 7,000 | $ 7,000 | $ 7,000 | $ 7,000 |
Answer the question below, i post this question for fourth time
please answer it
contains a list of available investment projects and their
respective cash flows. Using a cost of capital of 10%,
Calculating IRR for the
projects - Using Excel function of IRR
Year | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
0 | -1000000 | -1000000 | -80000 | -400000 | -17000 | -5000 | -5000 | -20000 |
1 | 200000 | 500000 | 1040 | 4161 | 16000 | 2000 | 0 | 7000 |
2 | 200000 | 500000 | 9456 | 37824 | 16000 | 2000 | 0 | 7000 |
3 | 200000 | 500000 | 11405 | 45618 | -16000 | 2000 | 0 | 7000 |
4 | 200000 | 18567 | 74269 | 16000 | 2000 | 15000 | 7000 | |
5 | 200000 | 47453 | 189812 | -52000 | 2000 | 7000 | ||
6 | 200000 | 6394 | 25577 | |||||
7 | 200000 | 45727 | 182709 | |||||
8 | 200000 | 51933 | 207733 | |||||
9 | 200000 | 85625 | 342499 | |||||
IRR | 13.70% | 23.38% | 21.38% | 16.96% | No IRR | 28.65% | 31.61% | 22.11% |
Calculating NPV of Projects using Discount factors at 8% discount rate
PV = CF X Discount Factor
Discount Factor = 1/ (1+ Discount Rate)^ t
NPV = Sum of PV of all future values
Year | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | Discount Factor at 10% |
0 | -1000000 | -1000000 | -80000 | -400000 | -17000 | -5000 | -5000 | -20000 | 1.000 |
1 | 181818 | 454545 | 945 | 3783 | 14545 | 1818 | 0 | 6364 | 0.909 |
2 | 165289 | 413223 | 7815 | 31260 | 13223 | 1653 | 0 | 5785 | 0.826 |
3 | 150263 | 375657 | 8569 | 34273 | -12021 | 1503 | 0 | 5259 | 0.751 |
4 | 136603 | 12682 | 50727 | 10928 | 1366 | 10245 | 4781 | 0.683 | |
5 | 124184 | 29465 | 117858 | -32288 | 1242 | 4346 | 0.621 | ||
6 | 112895 | 3609 | 14438 | 0.564 | |||||
7 | 102632 | 23465 | 93759 | 0.513 | |||||
8 | 93301 | 24227 | 96909 | 0.467 | |||||
9 | 84820 | 36313 | 145253 | 0.424 | |||||
NPV | 151805 | 243426 | 67090 | 188259 | -22612 | 2582 | 5245 | 6536 | |
Cumulative Cash flows for Pay Back Period
PBP = The immediately preceding year before Cumulative Cash flows is positive + (Cumulative CF in Previous year/ Cash flow in the year cumulative CF turns positive)
Thus PBP for Project D = 6 + (27739 / 182,709) = 6.1518
Similarly for others
Year | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
0 | (1,000,000) | (1,000,000) | (80,000) | (400,000) | (17,000) | (5,000) | (5,000) | (20,000) |
1 | (800,000) | (500,000) | (78,960) | (395,839) | (1,000) | (3,000) | (5,000) | (13,000) |
2 | (600,000) | - | (69,504) | (358,015) | 15,000 | (1,000) | (5,000) | (6,000) |
3 | (400,000) | 500,000 | (58,099) | (312,397) | (1,000) | 1,000 | (5,000) | 1,000 |
4 | (200,000) | (39,532) | (238,128) | 15,000 | 3,000 | 10,000 | 8,000 | |
5 | - | 7,921 | (48,316) | (37,000) | 5,000 | 15,000 | ||
6 | 200,000 | 14,315 | (22,739) | |||||
7 | 400,000 | 60,042 | 159,970 | |||||
8 | 600,000 | 111,975 | 367,703 | |||||
9 | 800,000 | 197,600 | 710,202 | |||||
PBP | 5.00 | 2.00 | 4.83 | 6.12 | #DIV/0! | 2.50 | 3.33 | 2.86 |
2. Conflicts - On the basis of IRR project G with 31.1% IRR should be the top one, but on the basis of NPV , it is one of the bottom ones. This is because, although G offers the best % returns, the initial investment as well the overall return in G is much less than say project B.
If the Organization has a large money to investment, it would not be wise to invest in Project G, even though it offers a high return.
Projects F,G,H offer high % return but very little in terms of absolute dollar value return.
Projects A,B,C & D offer higher NPV. They also have IRR greater than the discount rate of 10%. These projects would take precedence if NPV is the selection criteria.
Project has no IRR. Also the NPV is negative and it doesn't have a Payback period
Advantages And Disadvantages of Capital budgeting Method
The aggregate of all present value of the cash flows of an asset, immaterial of positive or negative is known as Net Present Value. Internal Rate of Return is the discount rate at which NPV = 0.
The calculation of NPV is made in absolute terms as compared to IRR which is computed in percentage terms.
The purpose of calculation of NPV is to determine the surplus from the project, whereas IRR represents the state of no profit no loss.
Decision making is easy in NPV but not in the IRR.
Intermediate cash flows are reinvested at cut off rate in NPV whereas in IRR such an investment is made at the rate of IRR.
When the timing of cash flows differs, the IRR will be negative, or it will show multiple IRR which will cause confusion. This is not in the case of NPV.
When the amount of initial investment is high, the NPV will always show large cash inflows while IRR will represent the profitability of the project irrespective of the initial invest. So, the IRR will show better results
Pay back period doesn't take into account time value of money but is most easy to calculate and makes the Decision making easier for managers
A discounted payback period uses the time value of money and is preferred therefore.
Practicality of different methods -
Pay Back period is the easiest to use and calculate too. Managers prefer it for this very purpose only. Although it doesn't take time value in account .
IRR is cumbersome and difficult to calculate.
NPV is preferred as it shows the returns in absolute terms, although the problems associated with discounting rate persists.
ARR is generally avoided as it gives accounting returns and not cash flow returns.
PI is as good as NPV and used along with NPV