In: Accounting
Frigid Motors Inc. assembles and sells snowmobile engines. The company began operations on July 1, 2016, and operated at 100% of capacity during the first month. The following data summarize the results for July:
1 |
Sales (35,000 units) |
$8,750,000.00 |
|
2 |
Production costs (42,500 units): |
||
3 |
Direct materials |
$4,250,000.00 |
|
4 |
Direct labor |
2,125,000.00 |
|
5 |
Variable factory overhead |
1,062,500.00 |
|
6 |
Fixed factory overhead |
637,500.00 |
8,075,000.00 |
7 |
Selling and administrative expenses: |
||
8 |
Variable selling and administrative expenses |
$1,150,000.00 |
|
9 |
Fixed selling and administrative expenses |
200,000.00 |
1,350,000.00 |
Required: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A. | Prepare an income statement according to the absorption costing concept.* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B. | Prepare an income statement according to the variable costing concept. A colon (:) will automatically appear if it is required.* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. | What is the reason for the
difference in the amount of income from operations reported in (A)
and (B)?
|
Marginal/ Variable Costing:
Let's calculate the Cost of production per unit first:
Also, Inventory Statement will look like below:
Let's prepare the Income statement using Variable costing approach:
Absorption Costing Approach:
Cost of production per unit will be different from cost computed under Marginal costing since under Absorption costing, fixed factory overheads are absorbed by the number of units producted during that period:
Inventory Statement will remain same as we computed in Marginal Costing approach.
Income Statement will look like below under Absorption costing approach:
Difference between Income under both the methods:
Income difference of $112,500 ($750,000 - $637,500) is appearing due to allocation of fixed overhead in Closing stock under Absorption apporach. It should be noted that Closing stock of 7,500 units under Absorption approach is inclusive of $15 of ovehead allocated to each unit which in turn increases the overall income. While Under Marginal costing, Fixed overhead of factory is charged as period expense.
Hence Under Absorption costing,
If the inventory increases, income under absorption costing will be increased in comparision to Income computed under Marginal costing