Question

In: Economics

If government imposes a tax of 8% on luxury cars that the consumer must pay, why...

If government imposes a tax of 8% on luxury cars that the consumer must pay, why does the consumer not actually pay the full 8%? How is it determined how much the consumer will pay and how much the producer will pay? Is it possible for an 8% tax the government imposes on the consumer to actually have 1% paid by the consumer and 7% by the producer? Why or why not?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Consumers do not pay the entire tax because the demand and supply are not perfectly elastic or inelastic. If consumers are paying the entire tax then either the demand should be perfectly inelastic or the supply should be perfectly elastic

in case of luxury cars the demand is generally elastic which means the tax is shared between buyers and sellers. The incidence of tax is determined by the elasticity of demand and supply. Generally the more inelastic side of the market bears a greater burden of tax. this implies that if demand is highly inelastic relative to supply then consumers will bear a greater tax burden

This is possible in case the demand is fairly elastic and the supply is highly inelastic so that suppliers are bearing a greater burden of tax.


Related Solutions

Consider a government that imposes a personal income tax. It is estimated that the tax will...
Consider a government that imposes a personal income tax. It is estimated that the tax will not affect total labour supplied in the economy. Given this, the political party advocating for the tax argue that the tax acts as a non-distortionary, lump-sum tax, and as such imposes no excess burden. Is this a reasonable argument?
Consider a government that imposes a personal income tax. It is estimated that the tax will...
Consider a government that imposes a personal income tax. It is estimated that the tax will not affect total labour supplied in the economy. Given this, the political party advocating for the tax argue that the tax acts as a non-distortionary, lump-sum tax, and as such imposes no excess burden. Is this a reasonable argument?
A tax on hamburgers Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before...
A tax on hamburgers Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before the tax, 16 million hamburgers were sold at $3.25 per hamburger. With the tax in effect, 14 million hamburgers are sold, buyers pay $3.75 per hamburger, and sellers receive $3.00 per hamburger. In the scenario above, what is the tax ($ per hamburger)? In the scenario above, what is the tax incidence that falls on the sellers of hamburgers? ($ per six pack)?
Suppose that the government imposes a $1 tax on a good that currently sells for a...
Suppose that the government imposes a $1 tax on a good that currently sells for a price of $5. Also, assume that after the tax is imposed, the good sells for $5.60. Which statement best explains the effect this has on the tax burden? a. The tax burden is being passed on to buyers. b. The tax burden is being carried by sellers. c. The tax burden is being shared between buyers and sellers. d. The tax burden is precisely...
Suppose the government imposes a tax on gasoline. Would the revenue collected from this tax likely...
Suppose the government imposes a tax on gasoline. Would the revenue collected from this tax likely be greater in the first year after it is imposed or in the fifth year? Explain using a graph. Would the deadweight loss from this tax be greater in the first year after it is imposed or in the fifth year? Explain using a graph.
Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before the tax, 16 million...
Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before the tax, 16 million hamburgers were sold at $3.25 per hamburger. With the tax in effect, 14 million hamburgers are sold, buyers pay $3.75 per hamburger, and sellers receive $3.00 per hamburger a) In the scenario above, what is the tax ($ per hamburger)? b) In the scenario above, what is the tax incidence that falls on the sellers of hamburgers? ($ per six pack)?
Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before the tax, 16 million...
Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before the tax, 16 million hamburgers were sold at $3.25 per hamburger. With the tax in effect, 14 million hamburgers are sold, buyers pay $3.75 per hamburger, and sellers receive $3.00 per hamburger. In the scenario above, what is the tax ($ per hamburger)?
1. The government imposes an excise tax on office rental space. Before the tax, the equilibrium...
1. The government imposes an excise tax on office rental space. Before the tax, the equilibrium price of office rental space was $3,500. After the tax is imposed consumers pay $3,600 on office rental space, $3,200 of which producers receive. [1] a) Calculate the excise tax on office rental space. [1] b) What is the incidence of the tax to the consumer? [1] c) What is the incidence of the tax to the producer? [2] d) Illustrate your answer on...
If the government imposes unit sales tax (i.e., $ tax per unit sold) on a product,...
If the government imposes unit sales tax (i.e., $ tax per unit sold) on a product, which one, demand, or supply will shift? Increase or decrease? Will the new tax cause "disequilibrium"? Please state clearly about the shift (leftward or rightward) and the equilibrium price and quantity change. No graph is required.  
If the government imposes a new tax on producers of apples, what happens in the market...
If the government imposes a new tax on producers of apples, what happens in the market for apples? Question 17 options: A) There is an increase in supply. B) There is a decreased in supply. C) There will be a decrease in demand. D) There is an increase in the quantity demanded.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT