Question

In: Economics

If the government imposes unit sales tax (i.e., $ tax per unit sold) on a product,...

If the government imposes unit sales tax (i.e., $ tax per unit sold) on a product, which one, demand, or supply will shift? Increase or decrease? Will the new tax cause "disequilibrium"? Please state clearly about the shift (leftward or rightward) and the equilibrium price and quantity change. No graph is required.  

Solutions

Expert Solution

We agree that if the government-imposed unit sales tax, then the price of the product goes up, no matter who pays the difference between the original product and the new taxed product. The supply curve would have no effect here because firms will most likely pass the imposed tax to its customers by increasing the final price of the product. A change that will occur is the marginal cost per unit would be increased, thus causing a higher or lower quantity to be supplied at a given price. Only when prices go up, will demand decreases, enabling the demand curve to shift leftwards due to the imposed sales tax. Demand decreases when producers increase the cost of their goods or services. When fewer people buy the product there is a surplus of supply because the quantity offered excessed quantity demanded. This new tax would cause disequilibrium to occur due to increasing the market price, which could potentially be above the equilibrium. The quantity supplied would also be greater than the quantity demanded which would cause this negative effect on the producer. In order to reestablish equilibrium, prices would have to fall and quantity demanded would have to increase since consumers are willing to buy more of a product at a lower price..


Related Solutions

A tax on hamburgers Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before...
A tax on hamburgers Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before the tax, 16 million hamburgers were sold at $3.25 per hamburger. With the tax in effect, 14 million hamburgers are sold, buyers pay $3.75 per hamburger, and sellers receive $3.00 per hamburger. In the scenario above, what is the tax ($ per hamburger)? In the scenario above, what is the tax incidence that falls on the sellers of hamburgers? ($ per six pack)?
Question 1: The government imposes a tax on each plastic bag sold such that the producer...
Question 1: The government imposes a tax on each plastic bag sold such that the producer of the plastic bags must pay the tax to the government. In the market for plastic bags, the: a) supply curve shifts to the left. b) supply curve shifts to the right. c) demand curve shifts to the left. d) demand curve shifts to the right. e) the supply curve and the demand curve shift to the left. Question 2: A positive externality exists...
Suppose the government imposes a tax of $10 on every pair of shoes sold be every...
Suppose the government imposes a tax of $10 on every pair of shoes sold be every seller in Canada. Will the $10 be paid by the seller, the buyer or both? How does the price elasticity of demand affects the incidence of this tax on buyers and sellers?
Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before the tax, 16 million...
Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before the tax, 16 million hamburgers were sold at $3.25 per hamburger. With the tax in effect, 14 million hamburgers are sold, buyers pay $3.75 per hamburger, and sellers receive $3.00 per hamburger a) In the scenario above, what is the tax ($ per hamburger)? b) In the scenario above, what is the tax incidence that falls on the sellers of hamburgers? ($ per six pack)?
Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before the tax, 16 million...
Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of hamburgers. Before the tax, 16 million hamburgers were sold at $3.25 per hamburger. With the tax in effect, 14 million hamburgers are sold, buyers pay $3.75 per hamburger, and sellers receive $3.00 per hamburger. In the scenario above, what is the tax ($ per hamburger)?
Suppose that a government imposes an emmision standard, and per-unit fines for exceeding that standard, at...
Suppose that a government imposes an emmision standard, and per-unit fines for exceeding that standard, at the socially efficient pollution level. if polluters believe that the probability of detecting standard breaches is not certain, illustrate the privately efficient outcome and any associated welfare loss. What per unit fine would induce a socially efficient outcome?
In Canada, anytime one purchases from a store, the government imposes a sales tax.
In Canada, anytime one purchases from a store, the government imposes a sales tax. In most provinces, there are two levels of sales taxes: The GST, which is a Federal tax, is set at 5% of the purchase price. Then, there is the PST, which is a Provincial tax that most provinces charge. The PST rate is dependent on the province. For instance, in British Columbia, the provincial rate is 7 % of the purchase price. You are to print...
Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of drinks withhigh sugar content. Before...
Suppose a state government imposes a tax on sales of drinks with high sugar content. Before the tax, 20 million six packs were sold at $2.50 per pack. With the tax in effect, 16 million six packs are sold, buyers pay $3.20 per pack, and sellers receive $2.30 per pack.A.) In the scenario above, what is the tax ($ per six pack)?B.) In the scenario above, what is the tax incidence that falls on the sellers? ($ per six pack)?
Consider a government that imposes a personal income tax. It is estimated that the tax will...
Consider a government that imposes a personal income tax. It is estimated that the tax will not affect total labour supplied in the economy. Given this, the political party advocating for the tax argue that the tax acts as a non-distortionary, lump-sum tax, and as such imposes no excess burden. Is this a reasonable argument?
Consider a government that imposes a personal income tax. It is estimated that the tax will...
Consider a government that imposes a personal income tax. It is estimated that the tax will not affect total labour supplied in the economy. Given this, the political party advocating for the tax argue that the tax acts as a non-distortionary, lump-sum tax, and as such imposes no excess burden. Is this a reasonable argument?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT