Question

The three question response posts must have a minimum of 200 words each and must directly quote and properly cite (using MLA format) from the assigned textbook readings.

1. Although Epicurus is a hedonist, he is clearly opposed to vulgar hedonism. Can you find additional arguments for or against the theory of vulgar hedonism? Is it not terribly “ judgmental” for us to claim that some pleasures are “higher” or “ lower” than others? Shouldn’t we just tolerate and accept differences of opinion in this area? Or does it make more sense to argue that there is a natural hierarchy of pleasures and pains?

2. Epicurus believes that fear of divine retribution is the greatest source of fear and anxiety. Do you agree with this assessment? Why or why not?

3. Epicurus argues that the best and happiest way of life is one in which one seeks to satisfy on the most basic, natural and necessary desires. Do you agree that embracing such a life of simplicity (no honor, fame, luxury or wealth) is really more conducive to happiness and tranquility than trying to “keep up with the Joneses”? If you said “yes,” then are you already taking measures to live in the Epicurean manner?

Answer 1

ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES, I AM ANSWERING THE FIRST QUESTION ONLY.

PLEASE UNDERSTAND.

1.

Epicurus is a hedonist of his era and he totally believed that pleasure is the only thing that is good in itself and pain is the only thing that is bad in itself. Epicurus believed that hedonism was to avoid all the things from life which gives pain to us and according to me, that is the reason he opposed vulgar hedonism or getting more intimated in a relationship. He was not at all against the relationships, but he did not support them much to the intimate relationships or relationships which gives pain. He was an atomic materialist and his materialism led to a general attack on divine intervention and superstition.

Hedonism declares pleasure to be its sole intrinsic goal, also the concept that the absence of fear and pain leads to great pleasure and its advocacy of a simple life. At this point, I believe naturally, that every individual has their own definition of pain and happiness and always has different intensity to feel those, so we can’t say which hurts one also hurts another, or that which gives pleasures to someone might hurt someone else. So, we can't generalize this thing but it depends on individual thinking and what people believe as their pleasure.