Question
In: Economics
Seller agreed to ship by sea 10,000 tons of potatoes FOB Tacoma, Washington, to Buyer in...
Seller agreed to ship by sea 10,000 tons of potatoes FOB Tacoma, Washington, to Buyer in Japan. Buyer designated the SS Russet to take delivery at pier 7 in Tacoma. On the agreed-upon date for delivery, Seller delivered the potatoes to pier 7, but the ship was not at the pier. Because another ship using the pier was slow in loading, the Russet had to anchor at a mooring buoy in the harbor and Seller had to arrange for a lighter to transport the potatoes in containers to the ship. The lighter tied up alongside the Russet, and a cable from the ship’s boom was attached to the first container. As the container began to cross the ship’s rail, the cable snapped. The container then fell on the rail, teetered back and forth for a while, and finally crashed down the side of the ship, causing the lighter to capsize. All of the potatoes were dumped into the sea. Buyer now sues Seller for failure to make delivery. Is Seller liable?
Solutions
Expert Solution
Yes, the seller is liable. According to the FOB Incoterms, 2000, the dealer is at risk to acquire the danger of all harm that might be caused to the merchandise until products have achieved the ship's rail at the predetermined shipment port. In such cases, hazard might not be borne by the purchaser. In the present case, merchant conveyed the potatoes to pier 7 on the concurred conveyance date, yet the ship was not at the dock since some othership utilizing the dock was moderate in stacking the products. Along these lines, the Russet needed to grapple at a mooring float in the harbor. Dealer had made all the fundamental arrangements for a lighter to transport the potatoes in compartments to the ship. Butas the container began to cross the ship's rail, the cable snapped and consequently the lighter capsized. Hence, the products still did not reach the ship's rail so the seller has to bear the cost for failure to make delivery.
To be sure,FOB is a global lawful term that requires a vender to convey products on board a transportation vessel to the purchaser. The dealer is required to meet his commitments with respect to the products. The expenses related with transportation products from the merchant's distribution center to the purchaser's store incorporate transport expenses to the port of shipment, stacking merchandise onto a delivery vessel, marine cargo transport, emptying costs, protection, and expenses of transporting the products from the entry port to the last goal.
Rahul Sunny answered 2 years agoRelated Solutions
In January, a buyer and a seller agreed on the sale of 10,000 pounds of tomatoes...
Seller in Sydney, Australia, agreed to ship goods on or before December 31 under a CIF...
In a cost-plus-incentive-fee contract, a buyer and a seller agreed on a target cost of $7,000,...
In a cost-plus-incentive-fee contract, a buyer and a seller agreed on a target cost of $7,000,...
Seller agreed to sell to Buyer a quantity of raw materials. The written contract provided that notice of defects, to be effective, had to be received by Seller before any use or within ten days of receipt
- For Questions 1-3: consider the following code: public class A { private int number; protected String...
- You are tasked with assessing the health department’s intervention program in preventing recurrence of acute alcohol...
- Compare the MOSFET, JFET , and BJT and identify the reasons these devices behave differently. What...
- How would you use SAS Enterprise Miner to create a neural network model of your example?
- Explain the use of neural networking modeling in predictive analytics.
- Current Market Mix of Netflix, as detail as possible, please.
- This is all one question, thank you so much in advance! You must evaluate a proposal...