In: Nursing
descriptive evidence based epidemiological analysis of polycythemia vera that includes the 5 w's which include analysis of determinants of health (evidence from scholary sources)
SCHOLARY
Background
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and
polycythemia vera (PV) are BCR ABL‐negative myeloproliferative
neoplasms (MPN). Published epidemiology data are scarce, and
multiple sources are needed to assess the disease burden.
Methods
We assembled the most recent information available on the incidence
and prevalence of myelofibrosis (MF), ET, and PV by conducting a
structured and exhaustive literature review of the published
peer‐reviewed literature in EMBASE and by reviewing online
documentation from disease registries and relevant health
registries in European countries. The search was restricted to
human studies written in English or French and published between
January 1, 2000, and December 6, 2012.
Results
Eleven articles identified from EMBASE, three online hematology or
oncology registries, and two Web‐based databases or reports were
used to summarize epidemiological estimates for MF, PV, and ET. The
incidence rate of MF ranged from 0.1 per 100 000 per year to 1 per
100 000 per year. Among the various registries, the incidence of PV
ranged from 0.4 per 100 000 per year to 2.8 per 100 000 per year,
while the literature estimated the range of PV incidence to be 0.68
per 100 000 to 2.6 per 100 000 per year. The estimated incidence of
ET was between 0.38 per 100 000 per year and 1.7 per 100 000 per
year. While a few studies reported on the MPNs' prevalences, it is
difficult to compare them as various types of prevalence were
calculated (point prevalence vs. period prevalence) and
standardization was made according to different populations (e.g.,
the world population and the European population).
Conclusion
There is a wide variation in both prevalence and incidence
estimates observed across European data sources. Carefully designed
studies, with standardized definitions of MPNs and complete
ascertainment of patients including both primary and secondary MFs,
should be conducted so that estimates of the population aimed to
receive novel treatments for these neoplasms are better understood
assist public health planning and provide valuable information
about the burden of illness to policy makers, funding agencies,
resource planners, healthcare insurers, and pharmaceutical
manufacturer