April Fool’s Day and humor in the form of fake news can
be an antidote to anxiety - but spreading false news on diseases
like cancer and the coronavirus is no longer funny when it
endangers lives.
One of the challenges today is to face fake news (false
information) in health due to its potential impact on people’s
lives. This article contributes to a new application of social
impact in social media (SISM) methodology. It focuses on the social
impact of the research to identify what type of health information
is false and what type of information is evidence of the social
impact shared in social media. Fake news has been defined as
fabricated information
that imitates news media content in form but not in organizational
process or intent, which overlaps with other information
disorders, such as misinformation—false or misleading
information—and disinformation, which is false information that is
deliberately disseminated to deceive people
False and misleading medical information about a range of
diseases has been circulating widely on social media for several
years, posing a potential threat to public health(link is external)
as it spreads rapidly and
effectively. These days this sort of enticing news is
everywhere we look – and wouldn’t it be great if we could lose
weight on an all-chocolate diet (just me?)! But behind these
attention-grabbing news stories lies a real risk to the future of
public health messaging. fake news can be related in many ways in
public health:
- Fake news concerning health on social media represents
a risk to global
health. The WHO warned in February 2020 that the COVID-19
outbreak had been accompanied by a massive ‘infodemic’, or an
overabundance of information—some of which was accurate and some of
which was not—which made it difficult for people to find reliable sources and
trustworthy information when they needed it consequences of
disinformation overload are the spread of uncertainty, fear, anxiety,
and racism on a scale not seen in previous epidemics, such
as SARS, MERS, and Zika.
- Therefore, the WHO is dedicating tremendous efforts aimed at
providing evidence-based
information and advice to the population through its social
media channels
- False information not only is misleading and fuels anxiety
but is also potentially dangerous when it suggests prevention measures or
cures that are dangerous to a person’s health.”
- A claim that eating nothing but meat will lead to rapid weight
loss is acute since it can be easily corrected by health
authorities sharing facts to the contrary. In contrast, chronic
misinformation is usually linked to personal or cultural beliefs
or norms, and is therefore more difficult to remedy even
when there is data to the contrary.
- For one, studies suggest that false information spreads more quickly than truth
on social media platforms. And the way misinformation or rumors
spread on social media varies by topic.
- actors generating misinformation on diet and exercise, might
differ from those spreading anti-vaccination messages. The spread
of anti-vaccine content is aided by bots and trolls, while major
contributors of diet and exercise misinformation might include
companies, celebrities, and social media influencers.
- Another reason why limiting misinformation content is
challenging is that claims are not always explicitly stated but the
information is presented in a way that allows individuals to draw
unsafe conclusions.
- The most extensively studied topics involving misinformation in
health are vaccination, Ebola and the Zika virus, as well as
nutrition, cancer, the fluoridation of water and smoking
- Disinformation spread by the anti-vaccine movement has led to
episodes regarding vaccination provoking easily preventable
disasters, such as the measles epidemic in Washington state
(January 2019). The spread of false information also explains a
decrease in immunization behaviors with respect to
measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations,
- The influence of social media discourses may differ depending
on age, culture or gender
HOW TO AVOID THESE FAKE NEWS:
- have anti-fake news agencies who attempt to counter the false
information about the disease when the news source cannot be
removed from social media, and work together with health bodies to
provide accurate medical advice.
- follow official advice to check the reliability of any news
sources claiming to offer medical advice.
- To limit the spread of misinformation, we have to first
identify a particular message as misinformation. This is
easier for certain types of health misinformation (such as
anti-vaccine messages) than others.
- Improved eHealth Literacy - Evidence suggests that critical
thinking is a skill that can be taught, and new resources to teach
ehealth and media literacy are becoming increasingly available
-
Using the Internet Collaboratively with Physicians.
Although laypeople may not always have the expertise to separate
health myths from facts, the internet can be an extremely powerful
tool when individuals collaborate with their physicians.
-
Creation and Distribution of Accurate Information
Ideally, scientists would create quality information, and the
media would communicate it accurately to the public. Unfortunately,
the peer-review process does not always guarantee high-quality
science.