Question

In: Accounting

The following extract is taken from an announcement released to the Australian Securities Exchange by the...

The following extract is taken from an announcement released to the Australian Securities Exchange by the Australian Agricultural Company:

AACo announced today its trading results for the three months to 30 September 2003 (Q1 FY04) in which unaudited revenue was $22.1 million from cattle sales equivalent to 12.6 million kilograms. Compared to the same period in 2002, revenue decreased 14%, while sales volume increased 21%. Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) for the three months to 30 September 2003 was ($3.2) million and compares with $7.7 million in the previous corresponding period.
The decrease in earnings was primarily due to there being no mark-to- market cattle value appreciation during the quarter compared to the previous corresponding period which saw a mark to market increase to trading cattle of 7.5%.
The lack of early spring rain saw many Queensland producers increase supplies of cattle to market during the quarter with the resulting downward pressure on prices as at 30 September 2003 impacting on the valuation of AACo cattle at that date. This trend has reversed in October, with prices rising in some categories in the order of 10%. Chief Executive Officer of AACO, Mr Peter Holmes à Court said 'We sold a high volume of cattle during the quarter, although the impact of last year's drought meant that they were generally at lighter weights. Prices, however, have subsequently risen due to the short supply of quality, finished cattle.'

Source: ASX Press Release, 30 October 2003, AACo First Quarter FY04 Briefing.
Required
(a) Explain what is meant by 'mark-to-market cattle value appreciation' in the context of AASB 141 'Agriculture'.

(b) Explain why no appreciation in the market value of cattle for the quarter ending 30 September 2003 resulted in a loss of $3.2 million compared to a profit of $7.7 million in the previous corresponding period.

(c) The volatile market conditions which had an impact on the Australian Agricultural Company serve to illustrate the principal difficulty of using fair value less costs to sell for biological assets.' Critically evaluate this comment.

Solutions

Expert Solution

(a) Explain what is meant by 'mark-to-market cattle value appreciation' in the context of AASB 141 'Agriculture'.

As per para 4 of AASB 141 "Dairy cattle" is a "Biological assets". As per para 5 "A biological asset is a living animal or plant." As per para 12 "A biological asset shall be measured on initial recognition and at the end of each reporting period at its fair value less costs to sell, except for the case described in paragraph 30 where the fair value cannot be measured reliably."

Australian Agricultural Company generate revenue through cattle sales. AASB 141 is an accounting standard which deals in accounting treatment of "biological assets, except for bearer plants and agricultural produce at the point of harvest". As per AASB 141, cattle is a biological asset therefore the recognition of cattle would be covered by this standard. As discussed above in para 12, a biological asset i.e. Cattle in the current case would initially and subsequently be measured at fair value. This means that at initial recognition of cattle, the inventory of cattle would be recognised at fair value. At every reporting period, the fair value of closing inventory of cattle would be determined and it would be recognised at the fair value at every reporting period.

The difference between the fair value at the end of reporting period and recognised value would be included in profit or loss and if this results in an increase, it would be called as mark-to-market cattle value appreciation.

For example

10 Cattles are recognised on 1 March 2020 with a total fair value of $10,000. At the ending of reporting period on 31 March 2020, these 10 cattles are unsold. Hence as per AASB 141, the fair value of the cattles have to be determined which comes a total fair value of $15,000. Hence, these 10 cattles would be recognised on 31 March 2020 at $15,000 with mark-to-market cattle value appreciation of $5,000 (i.e. $15,000-$10,000). For simplicity costs to sell is assumed as zero

(b) Explain why no appreciation in the market value of cattle for the quarter ending 30 September 2003 resulted in a loss of $3.2 million compared to a profit of $7.7 million in the previous corresponding period.

As per the question the lack of early spring rain saw many Queensland producers increase supplies of cattle to market during the quarter with the resulting downward pressure on prices as at 30 September 2003 impacting on the valuation of AACo cattle at that date. This implies that value of the inventory of cattle was lower at the quarter ending 30 September 2003 as compared to previous corresponding period. Further, the question has mentioned that Compared to the same period in 2002, revenue decreased 14%, while sales volume increased 21%. This implies that depsite increase in sales volume the revenue has declined. The decrease in earnings was primarily due to there being no mark-to- market cattle value appreciation during the quarter compared to the previous corresponding period which saw a mark to market increase to trading cattle of 7.5%.

The reason for loss as comparison to previous corresponding period can be because of the following reasons-

a) As discussed in 'a' above, the cattle being a biological asset would be recognised at fair value at the end of reporting period. Hence, the value of the opening inventory of the quarter ending as at 30 September 2003, would be higher than the sales price of the cattle during the year. The sales price would be lower because as mentioned in the question "increase supplies of cattle to market during the quarter with the resulting downward pressure on prices as at 30 September 2003". Thus resulting into a loss.

b) Another reason for the loss is that the opening inventory which remains unsold as at 30 September 2003 would have a decline in the fair value as compared to the carrying value, resulting into a loss

For example

Situation in current period

10 Cattles value of inventory on 30 June 2003 is $15,000. Suppose at the end of the quarter 30 September 2003 per cattle price is $1,100. Suppose during the year 2 cattles are sold at $1,200 each. For simplicity costs to sell is assumed as zero

The loss during the 30 September 2003:

Loss on sale of 2 cattles $ 600 ((1500-1200)*2)

Plus loss on closing inventory $3,200 ((1500-1100)*8)

Total loss $3,800 (600+3200)

Situation in previous corresponding period

10 Cattles value of inventory on 30 June 2002 is $15,000. Suppose at the end of the quarter 30 September 2002 per cattle price is $1,612.5 (1500*7.5%+1500). Suppose during the year 2 cattles are sold at $1,600 each. For simplicity costs to sell is assumed as zero

The profit during the 30 September 2002:

Profit on sale of 2 cattles $ 100 ((1600-1500)*2)

Plus mark to mark appreciation on closing inventory $900 ((1612.5-1500)*8)

Total profit $1,000 (100+900)

This type of situation has resulted in loss as at 30 September 2003. However as per the question, in previous corresponding period there was a mark to market increase to trading cattle of 7.5% which resulted in a profit during that period basis the discussion done in point 'a'.

(c) The volatile market conditions which had an impact on the Australian Agricultural Company serve to illustrate the principal difficulty of using fair value less costs to sell for biological assets.' Critically evaluate this comment.

The normal inventories are recognised at lower of cost or net realisable value. However, biological assets are recognised at its fair value less costs to sell irrespective of the cost. Leading to the biggest challenge for the Companies in this industry for determining the fair value. As it is known in general parlance, the price of biological assets and agriculture produce varies significantly demanding of the demand and supply situation. Being a permissible and essential item, the value is very sensitive to the cultivation/supply in comparison to the demand. The price will not be the same in every season or even for the same season in comparison to the previous corresponding period. The same is demostrated in the above question. Depsite increase in sales volume the revenue has declined in the current period in comparison to corresponding pervious year. The decrease in earnings was primarily due to there being no mark-to- market cattle value appreciation during the quarter compared to the previous corresponding period which saw a mark to market increase to trading cattle of 7.5%. This implies that decrease in earning was not due to decrease in the sales volume rather just because of fall in the price becuase of excess supply. Hence, using fair value to recognise the biological asset would result in huge fluctuation in the financial statement. In the lien period there would be a significant loss in comparison to exponential gain in peak season. This would make the financial statement volatile and non-comparable.


Related Solutions

Evaluate the role of Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) in assisting corporate governance in Australia?
Evaluate the role of Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) in assisting corporate governance in Australia?
Kathmandu Holdings Limited is a public company with shares listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. Kathmandu...
Kathmandu Holdings Limited is a public company with shares listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. Kathmandu Holdings Limited is a transnational chain of retail stores, selling travel and adventure outdoor apparel and equipment. Kathmandu is a retailer of clothing and equipment for travel and adventure in New Zealand and Australia. Kathmandu Holdings Limited have released their 2019 Business Sustainability Report, which contains information about the company’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. The following information has been extracted from the 2019...
Caring for Kids Ltd (CFK) is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. The company provides childcare...
Caring for Kids Ltd (CFK) is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. The company provides childcare services for pre-school children. CFK has undertaken significant expansion of its operations over the past two years. This strategy has resulted in the acquisition of a total of 200 new centres with childcare licences in Australia, New Zealand and the Page 259 United Kingdom. The expansion strategy has been funded mainly from borrowings that have been sourced in both local and foreign currency. CFK’s...
On 31 December 2018 the following extract was taken from the balance sheet of BBD. Non-Current...
On 31 December 2018 the following extract was taken from the balance sheet of BBD. Non-Current Assets Cost Accumulated depreciation NBV K K K Equipment 60 000 24 000 36 000 Office Computers 8 000 5 600 2 400 Total 68 000 29 600 38 400 The following transactions took place during the year ended 31 December 2019: On 31 May 2019, equipment purchased on 1 August 2016, at a cost of K28 000, was sold for K10 000. Payment...
The extract below is taken from a Level Book for levels taken between 2 TBMs. Complete...
The extract below is taken from a Level Book for levels taken between 2 TBMs. Complete the Level Book entries as well as calculate the adjusted RL (reduced levels) for all entries. The misclose error can be assumed acceptable. Note: all staff readings are in meters. BS IS FS Rise Fall RL Correction Corrected RL Notes 1.379 TBM RL 175.5 2.795 PEG 1 3.215 PEG 2 0.595 PEG 3 1.270 PEG 4 1.280 3.215 CP B 1.030 PEG 5 3.045...
8. The following data are taken from the financial market pages of an Australian newspaper. Forward...
8. The following data are taken from the financial market pages of an Australian newspaper. Forward Margins Forward Contract Forward Margins (Buy A$/Sell A$) 1 month 0/1 2 months 1/2 3 months 1/3 6 months 2/4 1 year 0/1 2 years -16/-8 3 years -51/-11 A) What do the forward rates indicate in terms of whether the A$ is expected to strengthen or weaken with respect to the US dollar?
7. The following data are taken from the financial market pages of an Australian newspaper. Forward...
7. The following data are taken from the financial market pages of an Australian newspaper. Forward Margins Forward Contract Forward Margins (Buy A$/Sell A$) 1 month 0/1 2 month   1/2 3 month 1/3 6 month 2/4 1 year 0/1 2 years -16/-8 3 years -51/-11 The data under the “Forward Margins” column represent the forward contracts for the US dollar with respect to the Australian dollar (given in points form). (a) Using this data, and the bid-ask for spot USD...
2. The following data are taken from the financial market pages of an Australian newspaper. Forward...
2. The following data are taken from the financial market pages of an Australian newspaper. Forward Margins Forward Contract Forward Margins (Buy A$/Sell A$) 1 month 0/1 2 month 1/2 3 month 1/3 6 month 2/4 1 Year 0/1 2 Years -16/-8 3 Years -51/-11 The data under the “Forward Margins” column represent the forward contracts for the US dollar with respect to the Australian dollar (given in points form). (a) Using this data, and the bid-ask for spot USD...
Part 2: Issuance of Securities The following announcement appeared in the May 15, 2017, issue of...
Part 2: Issuance of Securities The following announcement appeared in the May 15, 2017, issue of the Wall Avenue Financial Journal: _________________________________________________________________________ This announcement is not an offer of securities for sale or an offer to buy securities. New Issue, May 15, 2017                                                                          $950,000,00                                                  CRUDE OIL& GAS, INC.                                           6.25% Debentures Due July 1, 2032                                                           Price 103.35%                              Plus accrued interest if any from the date of issuance Copies of the prospectus and the related prospectus supplement may be obtained from...
The table below is taken from the Australian Bureau of Statistics website.
  The table below is taken from the Australian Bureau of Statistics website. It provides data on mortgage repayment (monthly) by Australian households living in different dwelling structures in the year 2011. Dwelling Structure Total occupied private dwellings Separate house Semi-detached, row or terrace house, townhouse Flat, unit or apartment Mortgage Repayment (monthly)         Total 2 709 429 2 324 546 190 411 187 375 $0-$299 114 197 99 624 7 352 6 694 $300-$449 64 357...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT