Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A. Suppose you have three possible outcomes following the occurrence of an event. These are {no...

A. Suppose you have three possible outcomes following the occurrence of an event. These are {no harm, some harm, a lot of harm}. Are elements of this set of outcomes mutually exclusive? Statistically independent? Can they be both? Why or why not?

B. Suppose you have three dimensions of harm of concern - confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Following the occurrence of an event, you may or may not suffer a breach of confidentiality, integrity or availability. Whether you suffer loss of confidentiality is statistically independent from loss of integrity or loss of availability. Furthermore, suppose the outcome on each dimension is binary - loss or not. How many mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive outcome possibilities do you have? List them.

Solutions

Expert Solution

(A) we have given element of outcomes are (no harm, some harm, a lot of harm) we will find is they mutully exclusive or statistically independent. (I) mutually exclusive events are event that cannot occur at same time and probability of occuring events together is zero. Here, no harm, some harm, and a lot of harm are events which are cannot be occure at the same time. This three event will not happen together. Hence elements of this set of outcomes are mutually exclusive. (II) statistical independent : events are said to be statistically independent if occurence of one event does not affects probability of occurence of other events. Here probability of occurence of event no harm does not change probability of occurence of event so harm and event a lot of harm. So they are statistically independent. (III) hence given elements of set of outcomes are both mutually exclusive and statistically independent. Because they satisfied condition of both mutually exlusive event. And statistically independent events. (B) we have given three dimensions of harm of concern which are, confidentiality, integrity, availability. (l) you suffer loss of confidentiality is not statistically independent from loss of integrity or loss of availablity. Because confidentiality, integrity, availability are dependent variable. They affects on each other so that probability of occurence of loss of confidentiality affects on probability of loss of integrity and availability. Hency they are not statistically independent. ( II) we have given outcome of each dimension is binary loss or not . Hence let event A= confidentiality={ loss, not loss} ; let event B=integrity = {loss, not loss} let event C=availability={loss, not loss} . Event are said to be mutually exclusive event. If event cannot happen simultaneously. If intersection of event A, B, C is zero. Then they mutully exclusive. Here intersection of A, B, C ={loss,not loss}which is is not equal to zero. Hence this are not mutully exclusive event. Hence number of mutually exclusive event is 0. (III) collectively exhastive events are event if at least one of event must occure. Or set of event covers entire sample space. {Loss confidentiality, not loss confidentiality, loss integrity, not loss integrity, loss availability, not loss availability} is collectively exhastive outcomes because they encompasses entire range of possible outcomes.


Related Solutions

Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.           Alternative...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.           Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 60 .20 70 .20 80 .20 Acceptable 60 .40 220 .40 250 .60 Successful 130 .40 240 .40 415 .20        Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.)        
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 40 0.20 70 0.20 75 0.40 Acceptable 80 0.20 140 0.20 255 0.40 Successful 135 0.60 205 0.60 405 0.20 Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.)
Q1) Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative...
Q1) Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 50 0.40 70 0.20 85 0.40 Acceptable 80 0.20 130 0.40 325 0.40 Successful 135 0.40 265 0.40 410 0.20 Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.) Q2) Highland Mining...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 60 0.40 80 0.20 70 0.30 Acceptable 85 0.40 150 0.40 275 0.60 Successful 140 0.20 220 0.40 410 0.10 Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.) Coefficient of Variation Rank...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next. Alternative 1...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 40 .20 90 .40 90 .30 Acceptable 60 .40 180 .20 280 .50 Successful 120 .40 240 .40 415 .20 Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.)
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given below. Alternative 1...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given below. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure $ 30 0.20 $ 80 0.40 $ 90 0.40 Acceptable 60 0.20 140 0.20 225 0.40 Successful 120 0.60 210 0.40 380 0.20 Rank the three alternatives in terms of least risk to most risk. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round the final answers to 3 decimal places.) Rank Coefficient of Variation
23) Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative...
23) Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 80 0.40 90 0.20 100 0.30 Acceptable 80 0.20 185 0.20 220 0.50 Successful 155 0.40 220 0.60 375 0.20 Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.)
Suppose you are holding stock A and there are three possible outcomes. Outcome 1 happens with...
Suppose you are holding stock A and there are three possible outcomes. Outcome 1 happens with 20% probability and -20% return. Outcome 2 happens with 40% probability and 20 return. Outcome 3 happens with 40% probability and 50% return. What is the Sharpe Ratio of stock A? 0.931 1.473 0.246 0.325
3) Suppose you wanted to simulate possible profit outcomes, and you know that revenues have a...
3) Suppose you wanted to simulate possible profit outcomes, and you know that revenues have a 30% likelihood of being $2 million, 12% likelihood of being $3.5 million, 48% likelihood of being $4 million, and 10% likelihood of being $4.5 million. Furthermore, Costs have a 30% probability of being $3.25 million and a 70% probability of being $3.5 million. Using Excel, simulate 100 instances of profit. Calculate average, minimum, and maximum profits. Is 100 instances sufficient? Why or why not?
****URGENT****** 1A)  An event has four possible outcomes, A, B, C, and D. All of the outcomes...
****URGENT****** 1A)  An event has four possible outcomes, A, B, C, and D. All of the outcomes are disjoint. Given that P(Bc) = 0.2, P(A) = 0.1, and P(C) = 0.3, what is P(D)? 1B) A study was conducted on a potential association between drinking coffee and being diagnosed with clinical depression. All 18,832 subjects were female. The women were free of depression at the start of the study in 1996. Information was collected on coffee consumption and the incidence of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT