Question

In: Finance

Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an...

Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an interest rate of 15% per year and a study period of 10 years.

Alternative C D
First Cost $-50,000 $-29,000
AOC, per Year $-7,000 $-4,500
Annual Increase in Operating Cost, per Year $-700 $-1,000
Salvage Value $11,000 $700
Life, Years 10 5

The present worth of alternative C is $ and that of alternative D is $ .

Solutions

Expert Solution

jeff jeffy answered 2 years ago
Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an...
Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an interest rate of 7% per year and using a study period of 10 years. What would be the resulted present worth of the alternative to be selected. Alternative C D First Cost $-5684 $-4060 AOC, per Year $-1015 $-812 Annual Revenue, per Year $2436 $1827 Salvage Value $812 $609 Life, Years 6 4
Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an...
Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an interest rate of 8% per year and a study period of 10 years. Alternative C D First Cost $-36,000 $-29,000 AOC, per Year $-10,000 $-5,500 Annual Increase in Operating Cost, per Year $-800 $-1,000 Salvage Value $7,000 $800 Life, Years 10 5 The present worth of alternative C is $ and that of alternative D is $ . offers the lower present worth analysis.
Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an...
Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an interest rate of 8% per year and a study period of 10 years. Which alternative should be selected and what is the PW of the selected alternative? Show steps for finding both alternatives. No excel. Alternative C D First cost, $ -40,000 -32,000 Annual operating cost/year -7,000 -3,000 Annual increase in operating cost per year -1000 0 Salvage value 9000 500 Life, Years 10...
Compare two alternatives, A and B on the basis of a present worth evaluation using i=8%...
Compare two alternatives, A and B on the basis of a present worth evaluation using i=8% per year and study period of 8 years. Which alternative should be selected based on PW calculation and what is the PW value of the selected alternative? Show work for both alternatives. No excel. Alternative A B First cost, $ -15,000 -28,000 Annual operating cost -6,000 -9,000 Overhaul in year 4 - -2,000 Salvage value 3,000 5,000 Life, Years 4 8
5. Compare Present worth analysis, future worth analysis, annual worth analysis and benefit cost ratio analysis...
5. Compare Present worth analysis, future worth analysis, annual worth analysis and benefit cost ratio analysis of project evaluation.
PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS TO COMPARE ALTERNATIVES - (a) Your agency is competing with another agency for...
PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS TO COMPARE ALTERNATIVES - (a) Your agency is competing with another agency for $10 million in government money. Only one of you will get the $10 million. Your agency will use the $10 million for college scholarships that will increase the knowledge and earning power of 100 people in about four years when they finish college. The other agency will use the $10 million to study how earthquakes affect home prices. Their study will take ten years...
Perform a present worth (PW)-based evaluation of the two alternatives below using a spreadsheet. The after-tax...
Perform a present worth (PW)-based evaluation of the two alternatives below using a spreadsheet. The after-tax minimum acceptable rate of return (MARR) is 8% per year, Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) depreciation applies, and Te = 40%. The (GI - OE) estimate is made for the first 3 years; it is zero in year 4 when each asset is sold. Alternative X Y First Cost, $ –8,000 –13,000 Salvage Value, Year 4, $ 0 2,000 GI-OE, $ per Year...
Perform a present worth (PW)-based evaluation of the two alternatives below using a spreadsheet. The after-tax...
Perform a present worth (PW)-based evaluation of the two alternatives below using a spreadsheet. The after-tax minimum acceptable rate of return (MARR) is 8% per year, Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) depreciation applies, and Te = 40%. The (GI - OE) estimate is made for the first 3 years; it is zero in year 4 when each asset is sold. Alternative X Y First Cost, $ –8,000 –13,000 Salvage Value, Year 4, $ 0 2,000 GI-OE, $ per Year...
Perform a present worth (PW)-based evaluation of the two alternatives below using a spreadsheet. The after-tax...
Perform a present worth (PW)-based evaluation of the two alternatives below using a spreadsheet. The after-tax minimum acceptable rate of return (MARR) is 8% per year, Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) depreciation applies, and Te = 40%. The (GI - OE) estimate is made for the first 3 years; it is zero in year 4 when each asset is sold. Alternative X Y First Cost, $ –8,000 –13,000 Salvage Value, Year 4, $ 0 2,000 GI-OE, $ per Year...
A breakeven analysis for net present worth is performed with a MARR of 15% and a...
A breakeven analysis for net present worth is performed with a MARR of 15% and a useful life of 20 years with the following data: Initial Cost: $750,000 Annual Cost (O&M): $60,000/ year with an annual increase of $5,000 each year Annual Revenue: $80,000/ year with an annual increase of $1,000 each year Salvage Value: $475,000 Determine the following: a. If the project is viable (i.e. if the profit is larger than the cost using net present worth). b. The...
ADVERTISEMENT
Subjects
ADVERTISEMENT
Latest Questions
ADVERTISEMENT