Bayer is a large German pharmaceutical company that was
founded in the 19th century. It is perhaps best known as the
company that introduced Aspirin.
It is the 1970s, and you are a consultant of the executives at
Bayer, who are trying to decide what avenues of research to
prioritize. The executives have recently learned about the
discovery in Japan of a very potent antibacterial compound called
norfloxacin. Bayer scientists claim that they have theories on how
to substantially improve on the discovery by the Japanese
scientists, to the point where the product they hope to develop
would easily outsell norfloxacin and revolutionize the market for
antibiotics. An antibiotic so effective would be lifechanging and
lifesaving all over the world, as bacterial infections are painful,
debilitating, and in many cases deadly. However, the decision is
not so simple.
Putting a drug on the market involves substantial costs: the
cost of the research to discover the compound (from millions to
tens or hundreds of millions), the cost of clinical trials (each of
three phases may be hundreds of millions), and the cost of
regulatory approval (the FDA again charges millions as a fee for
getting approval). Estimates of the average cost range from
hundreds of millions to billions of dollars. The marginal cost of
producing a drug, by contrast, is substantially lower.
Now, consider Bayer’s problem. Suppose that if it invests, the
cost to get the drug from the scientists’ brains to FDA approval is
$1 billion. However, once the drug is discovered and information
about it published (as is required), other companies can easily
produce it without incurring the $1 billion research and
development (R&D) cost. These companies would still incur the
marginal cost of production, but would effectively have no fixed
costs.
1. Show the cost structure and break-even point of Bayer,
including whatever curves are necessary to show this.
2. Bayer knows that an American company, Barr Pharmaceuticals,
will likely produce a generic version of the drug as soon as
Bayer’s results are released. On a second graph beside the Bayer
graph, show the cost structure and break-even point of Barr
Pharmaceuticals as compared to that of Bayer, including whatever
curves are necessary to show this.
3. In addition to Barr Pharmaceuticals, there are many other
potential entrants into the generic antibiotic market. What will
the long-run price of the drug be, if this is the case? Show the
location of the long-run price on your cost structure graph from
the previous question.
4. From a business point of view, would you recommend Bayer to
invest? Characterize the consumer and producer surpluses as a
consequence of your recommendation.
This isn’t quite how the pharmaceutical market works in
real-life. Bayer will actually be able to apply for a document that
make it illegal for companies like Barr Pharmaceuticals to produce
the drug—this document is a patent. With the ability to prevent
Barr from producing, Bayer will effectively have a monopoly on the
new antibiotic once it discovers it.
5. Return to your diagram of Bayer’s cost structure and add
consumer demand. Assume that at least part of the demand curve lies
above Bayer’s ATC curve. Indicate the range of prices/quantities
for which Bayer can make a profit. (Add any other curves that are
necessary to show this).
Given that the patent system exists, Bayer decides to go ahead
with the research. Congratulations, your company has just
discovered ciprofloxacin, 2 to 10 times as strong as norfloxacin,
and one of the most widely prescribed antibiotics in the
world!
6. Indicate the profit maximizing price/quantity for Bayer,
and shade in the consumer and producer surpluses if Bayer maximizes
its profit.
7. Shade in the deadweight loss.
8. Now, suppose Bayer sells the medicine directly to consumers
and can charge a different price on every transaction it makes
(this is called pure price discrimination). If it is able to do
this, indicate the consumer surplus, producer surplus, and
deadweight loss on your graph.