In: Accounting
Salespersons' Report and Analysis
Walthman Industries Inc. employs seven salespersons to sell and distribute its product throughout the state. Data taken from reports received from the salespersons during the year ended December 31 are as follows:
Salesperson | Total Sales | Variable Cost of Goods Sold | Variable Selling Expenses | |||||
Case | $620,000 | $266,600 | $136,400 | |||||
Dix | 360,000 | 158,400 | 79,200 | |||||
Johnson | 585,000 | 193,050 | 99,450 | |||||
LaFave | 505,000 | 257,550 | 90,900 | |||||
Orcas | 423,000 | 152,280 | 63,450 | |||||
Sussman | 594,000 | 285,120 | 112,860 | |||||
Willbond | 480,000 | 182,400 | 72,000 |
Required:
1. Prepare a table indicating contribution margin, variable cost of goods sold as a percent of sales, variable selling expenses as a percent of sales, and contribution margin ratio by salesperson. Round percents to the nearest whole number. Enter all amounts as positive numbers.
Waltham Industries Inc. | ||||
Salespersons' Analysis | ||||
For the Year Ended December 31 | ||||
Salesperson | Contribution Margin | Variable Cost of Goods Sold as a Percent of Sales |
Variable Selling Expenses as a Percent of Sales |
Contribution Margin Ratio |
Case | $ | % | % | % |
Dix | % | % | % | |
Johnson | % | % | % | |
LaFave | % | % | % | |
Orcas | % | % | % | |
Sussman | % | % | % | |
Willbond | % | % | % |
2. Which salesperson generated the highest contribution margin ratio for the year?
3. Identify the factors other than contribution margin that should be considered in evaluating the performance of salespersons.
The table as computed is stated below:
Sales person | Total Sales | Variable Cost of Goods Sold | Variable Selling Expenses | Contribution Margin | Variable Cost of Goods Sold as a % of Sales | Variable Selling Expense as a % of Sales | Contribution Margin Ratio |
A | B | C | D | E=B-(C+D) | F=C/B% | G=D/B% | H=E/B% |
Case | $620,000 | $266,600 | $136,400 | $217,000 | 43% | 22% | 35% |
Dix | 360,000 | 158,400 | 79,200 | $122,400 | 44% | 22% | 34% |
Johnson | 585,000 | 193,050 | 99,450 | $292,500 | 33% | 17% | 50% |
LaFave | 505,000 | 257,550 | 90,900 | $156,550 | 51% | 18% | 31% |
Orcas | 423,000 | 152,280 | 63,450 | $207,270 | 36% | 15% | 49% |
Sussman | 594,000 | 285,120 | 112,860 | $196,020 | 48% | 19% | 33% |
Willbond | 480,000 | 182,400 | 72,000 | $225,600 | 38% | 15% | 47% |
As clearly evident from the chart Johnson generated the highest contribution margin ratio for the year at 50%. He is just better than Orcas which gave a 49% contribution margin.
Contribution margin alone cannot be regarded for evaluating the performance of salesperson. The other factors which need to be considered in evaluating the performance should be
Volume of Sales: Sales is considered as a very important factor as a performance factor. It measures to what extent the market is overed by the company. Hence in terms of volume of sales, Case leads with $620,000 sales
Variable Selling Expenses: The variable cost of goods sold is not in hands of the salespersons, but variable selling expenses is. Hence the salesperson generating sales with minimal cost of sales should be considered as a good performance. In this case Orcas and Willbond have shown good performance incurring only 15% variable selling expenses.
Again out of the options given here, "All of the above holds good" as each of these other factors are important to be considered in evaluating the performance of sales persons.