Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A study was designed to compare the mortality rate of two drugs – Drug A and...

A study was designed to compare the mortality rate of two drugs – Drug A and Drug B. There were 7720 patients assigned to Drug A and 7780 patients assigned to Drug B (randomly assigned). The mortality rate in Drug A was 5.4% and the mortality rate in drug B was 3.8%. Use to test whether the mortality rates across the two drugs are significantly different.

Round your solution to two significant digits after decimal.

a. Specify the null and alternate hypothesis using appropriate notation. (1 point)

b. Compute the test statistic. (4 points)

c. Compute the p-value based on test statistic obtained in part b. (2 points)

d. Based on the p-value obtained in part c) specify your decision regarding the null hypothesis. (1 point)

e. Interpret the findings based on part d) in the context of this question. (2 point)

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer:

Given that:


A study was designed to compare the mortality rate of two drugs – Drug A and Drug B. There were 7720 patients assigned to Drug A and 7780 patients assigned to Drug B (randomly assigned). The mortality rate in Drug A was 5.4% and the mortality rate in drug B was 3.8%.

a) Specify the null and alternate hypothesis using appropriate notation.




b) Compute the test statistic


c) Compute the p-value based on test statistic obtained in part b.

p value two tail z test

2* left tail probability

left tail prob in excel is given by

=NORM.S.DIST(-4.756386,TRUE)

= 9.85447E-07

P=2*9.85447E-07

=1.97089E-06

p-value=0.000002

d)  Based on the p-value obtained in part c) specify your decision regarding the null hypothesis

p-value=0.000002

p<alpha

Reject the null hypothesis

e) Interpret the findings based on part d) in the context of this question

There is sufficient statistical evidence at 2 % level of significance to conclude that mortality rates across the two drugs are significantly different


Related Solutions

A study is designed to compare two drugs for relieving tension among employees in stressful jobs....
A study is designed to compare two drugs for relieving tension among employees in stressful jobs. A medical team collects data on levels of tension of the subjects in two treatment groups at the end of two months of treatment. The variances computed from the sample data are (S1)^2=2916 and (S2)^2=4624. There are 8 subjects in each group. At the 0.05 level of significance, do these data provide sufficient evidence to suggest that the variability in tension levels is different...
An experimental study was conducted in order to compare the effectiveness of two drugs in the...
An experimental study was conducted in order to compare the effectiveness of two drugs in the treatment of hypertension. 60 patients with similar hypertension conditions were included in the study. Researchers randomly assigned 30 hypertensive patients to each treatment group. The patients in group one received drug 1 while those in group two received drug 2. After the treatment, the patients in group one had an average blood pressure of 131.80 with a standard deviation of 2.50, and the patients...
Compare the mortality rate between two different countries of interest or between the Worldwide rate and...
Compare the mortality rate between two different countries of interest or between the Worldwide rate and any one country of interest.  You will perform a Two Sample Hypothesis Test of Proportions to compare the data.  Be sure to conduct a complete five step Hypothesis Test.  You may want to review the example problems posted in this week’s discussion stream.  State the conclusions based on the results of the test. Are there any reasons for the similarity or difference in mortality rates in the test?  In...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 11 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 56.1 with a standard deviation of 5.5 A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 12 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 47.5 with a standard deviation of 7.8. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 12 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 54.7 with a standard deviation of 6. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 10 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 45.3 with a standard deviation of 4.5. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 10 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 65.8 with a standard deviation of 5.1. A...
10. A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards...
10. A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 17 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 55.3 with a standard deviation of 6.4....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 12 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 47.5 with a standard deviation of 7.8 ....
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT