Question

In your own words, are there any problems in looking for a “quick fix” for the normal decline in sexual function that comes with aging? Discuss the pros and cons of the medicalization of sexual dysfunction.

Answer 1

In my opinion, I don’t see any problems looking for a “quick fix” for the sexual decline that expectedly comes with aging, as long it is a well-informed, safe decision and is carried out in moderation. Seeking a medical expert’s opinion with respect to the dosage helps to ensure that medication for sexual arousal does not produce negative side effects. It can become problematic and even harmful when this “quick fix” is used impulsively and recklessly without the backing of a knowledgable source.

The advantage associated with the medicalisation of sexual dysfunction is that in many cases, medical treatments are more reliable and effective than psychological interventions. This would lead to quicker recovery from the problem, thereby reducing patient distress to a large degree. However, a drawback in this case would be that the individual might become dependent upon medication, without which his/her sexual functioning could be impacted. Another case in point is that sexual dysfunctions often have a psychological basis, which medication alone cannot address.