Question

In: Advanced Math

Construct your own valid DEDUCTIVE arguments by applying the FIVE argument forms (rules) on the worksheet...

Construct your own valid DEDUCTIVE arguments by applying the FIVE argument forms (rules) on the worksheet below. You will need to insert your own example for each rule, following the form of the argument. A TRANSLATION KEY MUST BE PROVIDED FOR EACH EXERCISE (see above for an example).

FORMS/RULES:

Modus Ponens

1) If p, then q.

2) p.

-------------------

3) Thus, q.

Modus Tollens

1) If p, then q.

2) Not q.

-------------------

3) Thus, not p.

Hypothetical Syllogism

1) If p, then q.

2) If q, then r.

---------------------------

3) Thus, if p, then r.

Disjunctive Syllogism

1) p or q.

2) Not p.

---------------

3) Thus, q.

Dilemma

1) p or q.

2) If p, then r.

3) If q, then s.

-------------------

4) Thus, r or s.

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Find an example of a sound or unsound deductive argument, or construct your own example. Outline...
Find an example of a sound or unsound deductive argument, or construct your own example. Outline or describe your chosen argument for your classmates, but don’t define your argument as sound or unsound. See if you can stump them! In addition to your main response, you must also post substantive responses to at least two of your classmates’ posts: Are the arguments they chose/constructed sound or unsound? What conditions do you think are necessary to make an argument sound?
Find an example of a sound or unsound deductive argument, or construct your own example. Outline...
Find an example of a sound or unsound deductive argument, or construct your own example. Outline or describe your chosen argument for your classmates, but don’t define your argument as sound or unsound. See if you can stump them!
A set of hypothesis and a conclusion are given. Use the valid argument forms to deduce...
A set of hypothesis and a conclusion are given. Use the valid argument forms to deduce the conclusion from the hypothesis. (i) p v q, (ii) q ->r, (iii)(p^s) ->t, (iv) not r, (v) (not q) -> (u ^ s) (vi) t
Is the following argument valid? If so, construct a formal proof (direct or indirect). If not,...
Is the following argument valid? If so, construct a formal proof (direct or indirect). If not, explain why not. If Alex gets a new job, then he will buy a guitar. If Alex wins the lottery, then he will buy a guitar. If Alex goes to Costa Rica, then either Alex got a new job or Alex won the lottery. Alex goes to Costa Rica. Therefore, Alex bought a guitar.
Determine each of the following arguments’ forms to be valid or invalid. You may use the...
Determine each of the following arguments’ forms to be valid or invalid. You may use the Venn Diagram proof method, the rules/fallacies method, or any other method, of your choice. 1. Some athletes are not baseball players and some baseball players are not basketball players. Therefore, some athletes are not basketball players.2. All creationists are fundamentalists because all fundamentalists are religious people and all creationists are religious people. 3. As no conservationists are litterers, no environmentalists are litterers, because all...
Explain the difference between deductive and inductive arguments and further give three inference rules (e.g., Modus,...
Explain the difference between deductive and inductive arguments and further give three inference rules (e.g., Modus, Ponens), illustrating them with examples.
IS THE INCOMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL A VALID ARGUMENT FOR THE DEFENSE TO PRODUCE? EXPLAIN YOUR...
IS THE INCOMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL A VALID ARGUMENT FOR THE DEFENSE TO PRODUCE? EXPLAIN YOUR POSITION.
State whether the following passages contain an argument. Explain your answer by defining the concept of an argument and applying it.
State whether the following passages contain an argument. Explain your answer by defining the concept of an argument and applying it. If the passages do contain an argument, identify the premises and the conclusions. (Each answer is worth 4 marks.) 1. Socrates and Plato are philosophers. All philosophers hate tomatoes. Hence, Socrates and Plato hate tomatoes. 2. Chaser is either a philosopher or a poet. He is definitely not a poet. Consequently, Chaser is a philosopher.
Write your own enumerative inductions: one with a strong argument and another with a weak argument...
Write your own enumerative inductions: one with a strong argument and another with a weak argument and identify the target group, sample, and relevant property. Demonstrate and discuss what makes an argument strong or weak.
1.Please define an argument or inference in your own words. (Hint: An argument is a movement...
1.Please define an argument or inference in your own words. (Hint: An argument is a movement of thought from known to unknown, when expressed in language it is an inference). 2.What is the aim of an "argument" or "inference"? 3.What is the difference between one single sentence (or proposition) and an argument? Explain briefly with the help of an example. 4.Often we make claims like, “It is going to rain tomorrow”, or “I think all apples in this basket are...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT