In: Economics
7. Policy Topic: We have a recession. What do I need to know about “sticky wages?” a. Explain the concept b. Describe and analyze all of the theories cited about why wages might be “sticky.” c. How do “sticky” wages play a large role in policy effectiveness? d. How does this concept change the policy approaches of Keynesians and Classicalists?
Sticky wages or stickiness of wages refers to the slow-paced changes in wages as a result of changes in the economic conditions. Generally, wages rates are said to be 'stickydown'. This means that they are relatively slower in downward movement than they are in the upward direction. In other words, wages usually rise faster than they would fall.
The concept of sticky wages is that nominal wages resist changes in the market conditions. They are rigid and do not fluctuate based on changes in economic conditions. For instance, in the case of a recessionary period, the wages rates do not fall as expected due to slowdown of economic growth. Likewise, during an inflation, they do not rise keeping pace with the price rise.
Reasons for Stickiness of wages:-
Policy effectiveness and sticky wages:- Assume the government increases the money supply in the economy. This would result in increased consumption which is met by a rise in income levels. At the consumer level this results in an increased nominal wage rate. This is because the government increases money suppy to increase economic activity to boost its growth rate. While the firms want to invest the money available in the form of expansionary activities, for example by increasing wage rates to increase productivity to meet the growing consumer demands. Sticky wages ensure that the workers do not get affected by the increase in money supply which would lead to an increase in price levels.
With respect to fiscal policy matters such as an increase in tax rates would not affect the consumption levels by a large margin as the firms do not cut wage rates due to the rise in taxes. This reflects in the pricing of the products. Consumers in general due to the lack of understanding of the markets do not change drastically their consumption patterns as they are mostly unaware that their real wage rates have not risen that much.
Keynesian vs Classicalists:-
Keynesian school of thought places significance on the government intervention in the markets. A change in price levels could be dealt with by fiscal or monetary policy measures. Now, as we know that wages are sticky, the government would be able to effectively introduce policy measures to influence the economic conditions or the movement of the market. This is the way Keynesians would view economic policy measures keeping in mind stickiness of wage theory. Keynesians look at short term effects.
Classical school of thought, proposed by Adam Smith, looks at providing long term solutions to economic situations. In this school of thought factors such as inflation, unemployment and regulations are taken into account while framing policies. It is believed that markets are self regulating and there is not much that the government can do to influence the markets. If at all any, it would harm the flow. Stickiness of wage theory as explained above would influence firms to change its output levels and cut employment to deal with a rise in costs, but not the wage rates as it would lose its workers to another firm, thereby reducing its competitive edge. Classicalists would alter supply and technological inputs to deal with economic situations than cutting wage rates.