In: Accounting
Austin Partners provides management consulting services to government and corporate clients.
Austin has two support departments —administrative services (AS) and information systems (IS)—and
two operating departments—government consulting (GOVT) and corporate consulting (CORP). For the first quarter of 2013, Austin's cost records indicate the following:
SUPPORT |
OPERATING |
|||||
AS |
IS |
GOVT |
CORP |
Total |
||
Budgeted overhead costs before any |
||||||
interdepartment cost allocations |
$690,000 |
$1,800,000 |
$7,325,000 |
$12,550,000 |
$22,365,000 |
|
Support work supplied by AS |
||||||
(budgeted head count) |
--- |
20% |
52% |
28% |
100% |
|
Support work supplied by IS |
||||||
(budgeted computer time) |
10% |
--- |
36% |
54% |
100% |
1. |
Allocate the two support departments' costs to the two operating departments using the following methods: |
||||||
|
|||||||
2. |
Compare and explain differences in the support-department costs allocated to each operating department. |
||||||
3. |
What approaches might be used to decide the sequence in which to allocate support departments when using the step-down method? |
1 | ||||||||||||
AS | IS | Govt | Corp | Total | ||||||||
a. | Direct method: | |||||||||||
Costs | 690000 | 1800000 | ||||||||||
AS cost allocation | ||||||||||||
(52/80,28/80) | -690000 | 448500 | 241500 | 690000 | ||||||||
IS cost allocation | ||||||||||||
(36/90,54/90) | -1800000 | 720000 | 1080000 | 1800000 | ||||||||
0 | 0 | 1168500 | 1321500 | 2490000 | ||||||||
b. | Step-Down method (Allocate AS First) | |||||||||||
Costs | 690000 | 1800000 | ||||||||||
AS cost allocation | ||||||||||||
(20/100,52/100,28/100) | -690000 | 138000 | 358800 | 193200 | 690000 | |||||||
IS cost allocation | ||||||||||||
(36/90,54/90) | -1938000 | 775200 | 1162800 | 1938000 | ||||||||
0 | 0 | 1134000 | 1356000 | 2628000 | ||||||||
c. | Step-Down method (Allocate IS First) | |||||||||||
Costs | 690000 | 1800000 | ||||||||||
IS cost allocation | ||||||||||||
(10/100,36/100,54/100) | 180000 | -1800000 | 648000 | 972000 | 1800000 | |||||||
AS cost allocation | ||||||||||||
(52/80,28/80) | -870000 | 0 | 565500 | 304500 | 870000 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 1213500 | 1276500 | 2670000 | ||||||||
2 | Cost allocated to | Govt | Corp | |||||||||
Direct method: | 1168500 | 1321500 | ||||||||||
Step-Down method (Allocate AS First) | 1134000 | 1356000 | ||||||||||
Step-Down method (Allocate IS First) | 1213500 | 1276500 | ||||||||||
For Govt,Higher cost is under step down method (Allocate IS first).Lower cost under step down method (Allocate AS first) | ||||||||||||
For Corp,Higher cost is under step down method (Allocate AS first).Lower cost under step down method (Allocate IS first) | ||||||||||||
Direct method ignores Services provided to supporting departments | ||||||||||||
Step-down method partially recognises services provided to supporting departments | ||||||||||||
3 | Approaches to decide the sequence in which to allocate support departments when using the step-downmethod: | |||||||||||
a) On the basis of % of services provided to supporting departments | ||||||||||||
Rank | ||||||||||||
1 | AS | 25% | ||||||||||
2 | IS | 10% | ||||||||||
b) on the basis of $ value of services provided to supporting departments: | ||||||||||||
Rank | ||||||||||||
1 | IS | 180000 | (1800000*0.10) | |||||||||
2 | AS | 138000 | (690000*0.20) | |||||||||
c) On the basis of cost in support department: | ||||||||||||
Rank | ||||||||||||
1 | IS | 1800000 | ||||||||||
2 | AS | 690000 | ||||||||||