Does the federal government have a moral obligation to cover the cost of health care for...

Does the federal government have a moral obligation to cover the cost of health care for individuals who cannot afford health insurance or whose health insurance benefits have been exhausted? Apply the utilitarianism theory to answer.

Expert Solution

According to the principle of utilitarianism, the acts are considered to be morally right if it brings happiness and pleasure as the consequences and morally wrong if the consequences are undesirable. According to this theory, Individuals who cannot acquire their own health care, will require assistance from the federal government. Thus they have a moral obligation to do so as it would ensure a desirable consequence for these individuals.

Hayet Jeridi answered 2 years ago

Does the health care industry have an ethical obligation to seek changes to malpractice laws when...

Does the health care industry have an ethical obligation to seek changes to malpractice laws when such changes would improve public health? In this instance, poor adherence to treatment protocols poses risks of drug-resistant strains of some diseases and virus mutations, which could affect public health.

If health insurance is supposed to cover the cost of care how would you explain to...

If health insurance is supposed to cover the cost of care how would you explain to a patient that a drug costing $800 a month be covered by only $200. Do you think that’s ethical and morally right?

How does the government regulate the home health care industry?

What societal changes have affected the cost of health care? How has the government responded to...

What societal changes have affected the cost of health care? How has the government responded to contain and reduce health care spending? What role should government play in controlling the cost of care and ensuring health coverage?

How is Moral Hazard related to Health Care and Health Care expense? short answer

3. i) To assist in ensuring adequate and affordable health care for all, the federal government...

3. i) To assist in ensuring adequate and affordable health care for all, the federal government has mandated that health insurers provide health insurance to all, regardless of their physical condition. Insurers may not reject coverage for pre- existing health problems. Explain why this mandate, standing alone, creates tremendous potential for adverse selection problems. ( 5 mark ) ii) Many health and casualty insurance policies require policyholders to pay a certain amount (called a deductible) for claims before the insurer...

Reconstruct Singer’s argument in support of the claim that affluent nations have a moral obligation to...

Reconstruct Singer’s argument in support of the claim that affluent nations have a moral obligation to provide financial assistance to extremely poor nations. What is John Arthur’s objection to Singer’s argument. Be sure to identify which premise, if any, in Singer’s argument he rejects. What is Garrett Hardin’s objection to Singer? Be sure to state and explain which premise in Singer’s argument Hardin would object to. Finally, state (and explain) who makes the better of the two objections.

At what level of government (federal, state or local) does responsibility for public health rest in...

At what level of government (federal, state or local) does responsibility for public health rest in the United States? Identify two roles/responsibilities of the federal government in public health and how this support state public health functions.

Explain the moral principles of autonomy and beneficence in health care ethics.

What is the moral hazard created by using health insurance to ensure access to health care...

What is the moral hazard created by using health insurance to ensure access to health care goods and services? What are the negative outcomes (prices, overall health expenditures, the quantity of needed versus discretionary goods and services) of not addressing this moral hazard?

Question