Question

In: Biology

What was wrong with Wakefield's study? Discuss at least 1 variable or approach that should have...

  1. What was wrong with Wakefield's study? Discuss at least 1 variable or approach that should have been controlled or assessed.
    • Consider the source of some of his data (parental memory, for example), the small sample size, and whether he considered other variables (genetics, diet, and so on) that could have resulted in symptoms in these children.
  2. Discuss the importance of a control group when using the scientific method.
  3. Did Wakefield deserve to be barred from medical practice?
  4. What were the consequences of his inflated conclusions?

Solutions

Expert Solution

  • For any controlled scientific study, a scientist starts with an observation and does some research to develop a hypothesis, then they design an experiment that relate some baseline group with a test group. Data are then collected to confirm or refute the hypothesis.

Andrew Wakefield, along with a research team, set out to find if bowel disease caused by vaccines led to autism. for this, He compiled a group of 12 children who had loss of acquired skills, developmental delays in language, diarrhea, and abdominal pain-essentially, those with both bowel disease and autism. He questioned each parent about the behavior and personality of the child before the child was vaccinated with the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine. He then testsed the children.

His reported data states that children experienced either gastrointestinal or autism-like symptoms, sometimes within a short period after being vaccinated. From these data, the researchers concluded that there was no link between autism and the MMR vaccine. Wakefield though, contradicted this conclusion and stated that the vaccine caused changes in the gastrointestinal tract of the children, which then led to autism.

Many researchers tried to duplicate this study and could not replicate Wakefield's results. In fact, they found no link between the vaccines, bowel disease, and autism. But, Wakefield doesn’t give any value to the other researcher’s conclusion. He has believed in his opinion that, viral vaccines are causing Autism. Being a researcher he should not believe on Parents talking because if they don’t have any lab reports revealing similarity between Bowel disease and Autism.

  • He had no normal (control) person so that he could finish his experiment.
  • Concerning the source of his data, He could have taken other variables also into consideration.

Example: Genetic factors.

Here, Children’s parents might be a carrier for the Autism.

Diet: Bowel disease of might have happened through their imbalanced diet)

  • According to Tian LH. “Scientific research aims at contributing to the development of human knowledge in all areas, being systematically planned and executed according to rigorous criteria of information processing.” The control group contains of elements that present exactly the same characteristics of the experimental group, except for the variable applied to the latter. This group of scientific control enables the experimental study of one variable at a time, and it is an essential part of the scientific method.
  • Surely, Wakefield deserves to be barred from medical practice, because due to his wrong interpretation of the result people got panic from life saver vaccines.
  • The consequences of his inflated conclusion was

             i) Measel epidemic in UK, as public got scared from viral vaccines.

             ii) His medical license was therefore revoked because he gave false information in public, which was so dangerous for human’s health.


Related Solutions

From the point of view of sustainability, what is wrong with the itemizing approach to environmental...
From the point of view of sustainability, what is wrong with the itemizing approach to environmental values?​
Answers should be at least three paragraphs long. 1. Discuss at length at least four things...
Answers should be at least three paragraphs long. 1. Discuss at length at least four things you could do to help shorten the close process as a new controller. 2. Name at least two documents a public company would be required to file under the SEC.   How often must they be file? Describe what they are and what information they would provide to the public. 3. Discuss at least two methods the controller can use to reduce costs. Discuss the...
What is wrong with relying on P values to interpret findings in a study.
What is wrong with relying on P values to interpret findings in a study.
How you have selected your study approach?
Sickle Cell Anemia Research1. How you have selected your study approach?2. Identify the reasons for selecting this approach.
QUESTION 1: Explain what is wrong (and how it is inherited) if you have the genetic...
QUESTION 1: Explain what is wrong (and how it is inherited) if you have the genetic defect of hemophilia. What specific types of cells in the circulatory system would be involved with hemophilia. QUESTION 2: A researcher is preparing to insert a gene of interest into a bacterial plasmid in order to clone a gene. Explain why the researcher would genetically engineer the plasmid to carry two useful genes, ampR conferring resistance to the antibiotic ampicillin and GEP encoding the...
Discuss and answer at least two of the questions listed below in detail. 1. Why should...
Discuss and answer at least two of the questions listed below in detail. 1. Why should investment securities be separated into different classifications (Hold to Maturity, Available for Sale, etc.)? Why not just treat them the same so you don’t have to worry about their ability or intention? 2. Is it possible for a company to “manage” its bottom line by classification or reclassification of securities? If so, how? Is this ethical? 3. What are the disclosure requirements regarding Sarbanes-Oxley...
What is wrong with our progress (as a country and as Filipinos)? Where should it start:...
What is wrong with our progress (as a country and as Filipinos)? Where should it start: from the government or from the people themselves? MINIMUM OF 250 WORDS
Discuss what should be the objectives that an ideal democratic government should have in mind when...
Discuss what should be the objectives that an ideal democratic government should have in mind when designing a mechanism for the reallocation of the electromagnetic spectrum. This is not a question about your own personal values, but rather about how to aggregate the individual values of different members of society. That is, I expect you to base your answer almost entirely on the different notions of social welfare in economics as pareto efficiency and utilitarianism
Discuss the importance of reverse logistics for businesses/supply chains.(The answer should be at least 1 page.If...
Discuss the importance of reverse logistics for businesses/supply chains.(The answer should be at least 1 page.If you don't know the question, don't answer.)
The following is just a suggestion of what your presentation outline should at least have: I....
The following is just a suggestion of what your presentation outline should at least have: I. Introduction. Description of the Country – map of location; brief history of the country; flag and currency of the country; principal languages spoken. II. Selected Demographic, Health and income-inequality indicators; Human Development Index – These topics are covered in Section 2 of the course. You should read up what these indicators mean. This is where you learn something new. Be sure to visit www.cia.gov;...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT