In: Statistics and Probability
A forensic pathologist wants to know whether there is a difference between the rate of cooling of freshly killed bodies and those which were reheated, to determine whether you can detect an attempt to mislead a coroner about time of death. He tested several mice for their "cooling constant" both when the mouse was originally killed and then after the mouse was re-heated. Here are the results:
Mouse |
Freshly killed |
Reheated |
1 |
573 |
481 |
2 |
482 |
343 |
3 |
377 |
383 |
4 |
390 |
380 |
5 |
535 |
454 |
6 |
414 |
425 |
7 |
438 |
393 |
8 |
410 |
435 |
9 |
418 |
422 |
10 |
368 |
346 |
11 |
445 |
443 |
12 |
383 |
342 |
13 |
391 |
378 |
14 |
410 |
402 |
15 |
433 |
400 |
16 |
405 |
360 |
17 |
340 |
373 |
18 |
328 |
373 |
19 |
400 |
412 |
Carry out the appropriate parametric statistical test to determine if there is any difference in the cooling constants between freshly killed and reheated corpses? Please provide me with copies of your INTERPRETED SPSS output and summarize the main results and conclusions in the space below Please note if pairing was valid as well as whether the means are significantly different from one another
(Parametric test) The SPSS output is:
The p-value is 0.064.
Since the p-value (0.064) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we cannot conclude that there is a difference in the cooling constants between freshly killed and reheated corpses.
(Non-parametric test) The SPSS output is:
The p-value is 0.103.
Since the p-value (0.103) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we cannot conclude that there is a difference in the cooling constants between freshly killed and reheated corpses.
Please give me a thumbs-up if this helps you out. Thank you!