Some argue that the Anglo-American separation of ownership and control is an inevitable outcome in corporate...

Some argue that the Anglo-American separation of ownership and control is an inevitable outcome in corporate governance. Others contend that this is one variant (among several) on how large firms can be effectively governed and that it is not necessarily the most efficient form. What do you think?

Expert Solution

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago

Compare the Anglo-American and European (Germany/Japan) style models for/of corporate control. Explain in few paragraphs.

The Agent Problem arises: A. Because of the separation of ownership and control in a corporation...

The Agent Problem arises: A. Because of the separation of ownership and control in a corporation B. Because managers have little incentive to work in the interest of shareholders when this means working against their own interests C. Both A and B D. None of the above

Some economists argue that the government intervention makes the economic outcome even worse. Some argue that...

Some economists argue that the government intervention makes the economic outcome even worse. Some argue that there are important economic roles of the government. What is your opinion? Does the government do good or bad? Briefly discuss.

What does globalization mean? Some scholars argue that it is a process that is both inevitable...

What does globalization mean? Some scholars argue that it is a process that is both inevitable and irreversible. Do you agree or disagree? What is the “myth of free trade”? How does the “real” history of free trade contradict with this “myth”? (HINT: Support your answer with providing a detailed account of how the “ladder-kickers” have achieved their goals for their own economic development.) Historically speaking, “whereas the Indian state’s efforts to promote a dynamic industrial sector fell prey to...

The professional management policies that result from the separation of ownership and control are considered to...

The professional management policies that result from the separation of ownership and control are considered to be a strength of firms held in the portfolio of private equity partnerships. (True or False)?

Some historians argue that the Mexican American War of 1846-1848 led directly to the American Civil...

Some historians argue that the Mexican American War of 1846-1848 led directly to the American Civil War of 1861-1865. In a well written and thorough essay, I would like you to lay out the reasons for this argument.

Due to changes in social structures such as the economy and corporate America, some argue the...

Due to changes in social structures such as the economy and corporate America, some argue the American Dream is no longer available to all Americans. On the other hand, others still believe anyone can climb the social ladder and experience social mobility. Think about whether you agree or disagree with the idea that social mobility is achievable for most Americans. Write an essay expressing your opinion about social mobility and the American Dream. Be sure to explain the sociological terms...

Some argue that the traditional role of managers and bureaucratic control systems are in conflict with...

Some argue that the traditional role of managers and bureaucratic control systems are in conflict with the principles and processes of self-management and self-designing teams. It has been suggested that managers need to change to be more like coaches in order for such agile teams to be effective. Attack or defend this idea and support your position.

.The integrated ownership of pipelines was initially used by some oil companies to gain control of...

.The integrated ownership of pipelines was initially used by some oil companies to gain control of oil-producing area. How did they use their transportation network to gain market control? What other reasons can be offered for integrated ownership? Are these reasons valid in today’s business environment?

In your own words, explain how stock ownership relates to control for another company. Is some...

In your own words, explain how stock ownership relates to control for another company. Is some level of stock ownership automatically enough to give control? Why or why not? Also explain what the point is of consolidation entries. Why can’t we just add across the various figures for both companies, without adjustments, to get the the correct totals for the group?

Question