In: Nursing
Describe the type of disaster preparedness advertising you think would be most useful to the urban population, and how it can best be communicated. Next, define a group environment that is influenced by the disaster advertisement you've selected. Now evaluate at least one nursing role related to disaster preparedness in this environment. Finally, Identify at least one key stakeholder related to the setting that a Community Health Nurse could collaborate with regarding disaster preparedness. Include why it is important to collaborate.
Risk in urban areas
The dynamics of change in urban settlements due to large scale
migration has led to the evolution of high-rise structures, mixed
land use, high population density, growth of cottage ad hazardous
industries, cross country gas pipelines, bulk oil storage tank
farms and thermal power stations. These increase losses during
disasters. The recent earthquake in turkey caused rippling of
electric poles. Collapse of buildings, refinery fires, and blocked
roads of so that rescue teams from Switzerland, U.S.A Greece and
Germany struggled to reach victims. More than 10,000 died. The
situation would be the same in developing countries unless loss
patterns are controlled through co-ordinated disaster management
plans.
Concept of mitigation
Mitigation embraces all measures taken to reduce both the effect of
the hazard itself and the vulnerable conditions to it, in order to
reduce the scale of a future disaster and its impacts. Mitigation
also includes measures aimed at reducing physical, economic and
social vulnerability. Therefore mitigation may incorporate
addressing community-related issued such as land ownership
distribution, etc. Depending on their purpose, mitigation measures
can be categorized as being 'structural' or non-structural.
Active preparedness measures
Both structural or non-structural mitigation measures may be termed
either 'passive' or 'active'. Active measures are those which rely
on providing incentives for disaster reduction. They are often more
effective than passive measures which are based on laws and
controls. For example, while codes and land use planning may
provide a legal context for mitigation, they are ineffective unless
rigorously enforced. Instead, measures which provide incentives
such as government grants or subsidies, lessening of insurance
premiums for safer construction and provision of government
technical advice are more effective.
Preparedness efforts
Structural mitigation measures relate to those activities and
decision making systems which provide the context within which
disaster management and planning operates and is organised. They
include measures such as preparation of preparedness plans,
training and education, public education, evacuation planning,
institution building, warning systems, and land use planning.
Disaster response
Coping with the effects of natural disasters is called Post
Disaster Management. It deals with problems concerning law and
order, evacuation and warnings, communications, search and rescue,
fire-fighting, medical and psychiatric assistance, provision of
relief and sheltering, etc. Once the initial trauma of the natural
disaster is over, the phase of reconstruction and economic
rehabilitation is taken up by the people themselves and by the
government authorities. Thereafter, the occurrence of the disaster
is relegated to historic memory until the next one occurs.
Preparedness plans the foremost step
The existence of a disaster-preparedness plan is blessing.
Distraught officials have at hand, a set of instruction they can
follow to issue direction tot heir subordinates and affected
people. This speeds up the rescue and relief operations and boosts
the morale of victims. Disaster plans are also useful pre-disaster
operations, when warnings have been issued. Time, which might
otherwise be lost in consultations with senior officers and getting
formal approval, is saved.
Response plans are formulated by different agencies that need to co-ordinate during emergencies. For example, the electricity supplying authority would be responsible for preparing an action plan, which would be used following a disaster event to restore full services quickly. The contingency Action Plan (CAP) already exists at the national level that lists out in detail the actions to be taken at various levels of government at the time of calamity. There is, however, a need to carry out a comprehensive revision of CAP followed by clear cut operational guidelines. Recently, a high power committee has been established to prepare a disaster management plant ad Central/State and district levels.
National policy
The Natural Disaster Management Division in the department of
agriculture and co-operation. Ministry of Agriculture, Government
of India deals with the post disaster relief operations. a
contingency plan has been prepared for dealing with the natural
calamities as a part of the national policy for the subject. The
important issued of the contingency plans are:
Types of Calamity
Natural Calamities, as contained in the plan, have been broadly
grouped into major and minor types depending upon their potential
to cause damage to human life and property. Earthquakes, droughts,
floods, and cyclones have been identified as major type of while
hailstorms, avalanches, landslides, fire accidents, etc. whose
impact is localized and intensity of the damage being much less are
categorized as minor calamities.
Role of the Central Government
In the federal set up of India, the responsibility to formulate the
Government's response to a natural calamity major or minor is
essentially that of the State Government concerned. The Center,
however, supplements, to the extent possible, these efforts by way
of providing financial and material assistance for effective
management of the situation in accordance with the existing scheme
of finance and relief expenditure depending upon the gravity of the
calamity.
National Crisis Management
National Crisis Management Committee (NCM), with cabinet secretary
as its chairmen is the supreme body at the center that operates to
provide policy response and/or administrative response.
The Crisis Management Group (CMG) headed by the Relief Commissioner deals with the matters relating to relief in the wake of major natural calamities. The CMG is responsible to:
Review every year the contingency plans formulated by the Central Ministries/Departments.
Review the measures required for dealing with a natural calamity.
Co-ordinate the activities of the Central Ministers and the State Governments in relation to disaster preparedness and relief and
Obtain information from the Nodal Officers of all the Ministers/Departments such measures.
State Crisis Management Group (SCMG)
The SCMG works under the chairmanship of Chief Secretary and State
Relief Commissioner. The group comprises of senior officers from
the Departments of Revenue and Relief, Home, Civil Supplies. Power,
Irrigation, Water Supply, Local Self Government, Agriculture,
Forests, Public Works and Finance and is primarily responsible to
formulate action plans for dealing with different natural
calamities in the state and co-ordinate with CMG at the Center. The
SMCG will also have district level plans for relief operations
formulated by collectors and deputy commissioners that provide
specific tasks and agencies for their implementations for different
calamites.
Mitigation strategy
The plans recognize the fact that effective community involvement
and public awareness can largely minimize the impact or disasters
and community based mitigation strategy would go along way in
strengthening and stabilizing the efforts of the administration.
The focus would be on community capacity building including
formation of community Emergency Response Teams (CERT)
The mitigation strategy also focuses on micro risk assessment and vulnerability analysis including hazard mapping, applied research and technology transfer to improve the quality of forecast and disseminate warning quickly. It also highlights the need for a disaster management legislation and relief and rehabilitation policy that would define specific roles and responsibilities as well as set-up permanent administrative structures and institutional mechanisms for disaster management. The importance of land use planning and regulations for sustainable development, which include development and implementation of building codes; principles of sage special laws. Structural and non-structural measures to avoid damage during disasters are given in the mitigation strategy document.
Training strategy
Training of the key community and social functionaries is essential
element for the successful execution of a Disaster Management
Action Plan. The DMAP cannot be fully operationalised without a
training strategy Manuals for warning and evacuation, Emergency
Operations Center (EOC) and District Control room, (DCR) have been
prepared keeping this in mind. The manuals list the tasks to be
undertaken by branch authority responsible. Information on the
important contact persons and emergency officials has been provided
in the manual. The state and the district plans also specify
guidelines for the community as well as NGO's and local community
based organizations in the advent of any disaster.
Community based preparedness strategy
For calculated response in case of a disaster a plan for community
preparedness is essential. The plan must incorporate.
Clearly perceived hazard and development hazard profile of the community and its neighborhoods.
Assessment of risk and vulnerability.
Identification of individual and community resources.
Like any other plan it must, be clear and simple, specific in details, define duties and responsibilities of each member, earmark various escape roots, and locate shelter sites.
The pan has to be written and so that we do not have to refer to it when emergency arises, a simple concise 'checklist' is needed.
The Panchayat resilient focal communities. This however is possible only with concerted efforts and conscious policy at top level.
Mutual aid scheme
For an effective response, identification of resources and
development of mutual aid agreements with neighboring resource
providers at district, state, country, and international level for
the extent and terms for sharing of resources during
emergencies.
Periodical mock drills to test and update the plan are of importance. Since a community is a dynamic entity, no plan can be static document.
Geographic Information System (GIS)
Disaster planning involves predicting the risk of natural hazard
and possible impact. The use of GIS can be made successfully in
communication, risk and vulnerability assessment and study of loss
patterns, search etc.
Hazard maps could be created for cities, districts, state or even for the entire country. They prove helpful for analysis and determination of hazard zones and likely affects during disasters. The maps can be successfully used in establishing response priorities, developing actions plans, quick disaster location assessment, for carrying out search and rescue operations effectively, zoning them accordingly to risk magnitudes, population details and assets at risk. The GIS and RS (Remote Sensing) facilitate record keeping and obtain status or on going works which are the most critical task disaster management.
Conclusion
Disaster can not be prevented totally. However, timely warning and
planning can minimize the affect of a disasters. An accurate
disaster management plans needs to be prepared. The use of modern
technology like GIS and RS can be of vital importance in the
preparation of plans. Keeping records of vulnerable areas,
monitoring of rescue and relief operations deciding response,
managing the data base etc. Mutual aid schemes shall be of great
help in mobilization of resources while mock drills shall ensure
the efficiency and affectivity of response. Training of the various
functionaries, and an effective public awareness and education
campaign involving the communities will ensure that the plans are
disseminated to the lowest levels.