On January 1, Poe Corp. sold a machine for $4,798,243 to Saxe Corp., its wholly-owned subsidiary....

On January 1, Poe Corp. sold a machine for $4,798,243 to Saxe Corp., its wholly-owned subsidiary. Poe paid $1.1 million for this machine, which had accumulated depreciation of $250,000 on the sale date. Poe estimated a $100,000 salvage value and depreciated the machine on the straight-line basis over 20 years, a policy that Saxe continued. In Poe's December 31 consolidated balance sheet, the accumulated depreciation of this machine should be shown on the consolidated balance sheet as:

Expert Solution

Answer

Explanation:
Accumulated depreciation is determined as follows:

Particulars	Amount
Historical Cost	$ 11,00,000
Salvage Value	$ -1,00,000
Depreciable Base	$ 10,00,000
Useful Life	20 Years
Straight-Line Depreciation Expense	$ 50,000

Calculation Of Accumulated Depreciation
Particulars	Amount
Balance On Sale Date	$ 2,50,000
Straight-Line Depreciation Expense	$ 50,000
Accumulated Depreciation	$ 3,00,000

Therefore, cost $11,00,000 and a accumulated depreciation
$3,00,000 should be included in consolidated balance sheet.

Please Like

ekkarill92 answered 3 years ago

In January of 2019, a wholly owned subsidiary sold Equipment to the parent for a cash...

In January of 2019, a wholly owned subsidiary sold Equipment to the parent for a cash price of $122,500. The subsidiary had acquired the equipment at a cost of $140,000 and the estimated useful life when purchased was 10 years, and there was no salvage value. The subsidiary had depreciated the equipment for 4 years at the time of sale using the straight line method. The parent retained the depreciation policy of the subsidiary and depreciated the equipment over its...

On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $210,000 in...

On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $210,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $189,000 but had a book value of only $115,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $310,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $101,300. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...

On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $330,000 in...

On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $330,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $297,000 but had a book value of only $181,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $430,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $140,900. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...

On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $190,000 in...

On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $190,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $171,000 but had a book value of only $104,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $470,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $154,100. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...

On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $250,000 in...

On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $250,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $225,000 but had a book value of only $137,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $350,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $114,500. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...

On April 1, 2020, Republic Company sold equipment to its wholly owned subsidiary, Barre Corporation, for...

On April 1, 2020, Republic Company sold equipment to its wholly owned subsidiary, Barre Corporation, for $40,000. At the time of the transfer, the asset had an original cost (to Republic) of $60,000 and accumulated depreciation of $25,000. The equipment has a five year estimated remaining life. Barre reported net income of $250,000, $270,000 and $310,000 in 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. Republic received dividends from Barre of $90,000, $105,000 and $120,000 for 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. What was...

The separate condensed balance sheets and income statements of Purl Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary,...

The separate condensed balance sheets and income statements of Purl Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Scott Corp., are as follows: BALANCE SHEETS December 31, 20X0 Purl Scott Assets Current assets Cash $80,000 $60,000 Accounts receivable (net) $140,000 $25,000 Inventories $90,000 $50,000 Total current assets $310,000 $135,000 Property plant, and equipment (net) $625,000 $280,000 Investment in Scott (equity method) $390,000 ---- Total assets $1,325,000 $415,000...

(a) Jessica Ltd sold inventory during the current period to its wholly owned subsidiary, Amelie Ltd,...

(a) Jessica Ltd sold inventory during the current period to its wholly owned subsidiary, Amelie Ltd, for $15 000. These items previously cost Jessica Ltd $12 000. Amelie Ltd subsequently sold half the items to Ningbo Ltd for $8000. The tax rate is 30%. The group accountant for Jessica Ltd, Li Chen, maintains that the appropriate consolidation adjustment entries are as follows: Required (i) Discuss whether the entries suggested by Li Chen are correct, explaining on a line-by-line basis the...

Larkin Hydraulics. On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a...

Larkin Hydraulics. On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a 12-megawatt compression turbine to RebeckeTerwilleger Company of the Netherlands for €4,000,000, payable as €2,000,000 on August 1 and €2,000,000 on November 1. Larkin derived its price quote of €4,000,000 on April 1 by dividing its normal U.S. dollar sales price of $4.320,000 by the then current spot rate of $1.0800/€. By the time the order was received and booked on May 1, the euro...

On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a 12-megawatt compression...

On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a 12-megawatt compression turbine to Rebecke-Terwilleger Company of the Netherlands for €4,000,000 payable on August 1. Larkin determined the €4,000,000 price tag on April 1 when the spot rate was $1.0800/€. By the time the order was received and booked on May 1, the euro strengthened to $1.100/€. Nevertheless, Larkin’s Director of Finance now wonders if the firm should hedge against a reversal of the recent trend...

Question