The federal government currently imposes an excise tax on air
travel. That is, airlines are required...
The federal government currently imposes an excise tax on air
travel. That is, airlines are required to pay a tax per passenger
on each flight. Suppose this tax is equal to $4.00 per
passenger.
Using the model of demand and supply illustrates the impact of
the $4.00 tax on the market for air travel. Identify on your graph
the price paid by consumers, the price received by producers, and
the number of passengers flown. What is the difference between the
price paid by consumers and the price received by producers?
The federal government currently imposes an excise tax on air
travel. That is, airlines are required to pay a tax per passenger
on each flight. Suppose this tax is equal to $4.00 per
passenger.
a. Using the model of demand and supply shows what the market
for air travel would look like without the tax. Identify on your
graph the market price, the number of passengers flown, consumer
surplus, and producer surplus.
b.Using the model of demand and supply illustrates...
The federal government currently imposes an excise tax on air
travel. That is, airlines are required to pay a tax per passenger
on each flight. Suppose this tax is equal to $4.00 per
passenger.
- Using the model of demand and supply shows what the market for
air travel would look like without the tax. Identify on your graph
the market price, the number of passengers flown, consumer surplus,
and producer surplus.
- If the price elasticity of demand for...
A student consumes beer and a composite good. Currently, the
government imposes an excise tax of $0.50 per unit of beer. The
student now purchases 20 units of beer per month. The government is
considering eliminating the excise tax on beer and, instead,
requiring consumers to pay $10 per month as a lump- sum tax. If the
new proposal is adopted, how will the student’s beer consumption
and welfare to be affected? (Assume that the student’s marginal
rate of substitution...
1. The government imposes an excise tax on office rental space.
Before the tax, the equilibrium price of office rental space was
$3,500. After the tax is imposed consumers pay $3,600 on office
rental space, $3,200 of which producers receive.
[1] a) Calculate the excise tax on office rental space.
[1] b) What is the incidence of the tax to the consumer?
[1] c) What is the incidence of the tax to the producer?
[2] d) Illustrate your answer on...
Suppose that the government imposes a $1 tax on a good that
currently sells for a price of $5. Also, assume that after the tax
is imposed, the good sells for $5.60. Which statement best explains
the effect this has on the tax burden?
a. The tax burden is being passed on to buyers.
b. The tax burden is being carried by sellers.
c. The tax burden is being shared between buyers and
sellers.
d. The tax burden is precisely...
5. The federal government recently decided to raise the excise
tax on hard liquor. 10 pts a. Graphically illustrate the effects of
this tax on the market for hard liquor. b. Would a $1 increase in
the excise tax on liquor increase the equilibrium price of liquor
by $1? Explain. c. How would the excise tax on hard liquor affect a
beer distributor?
The market for air travel in Austria is primarily composed of a
few airlines: Austrian Airlines along with its low-cost competitors
Lauda and Wizz Air.
From 2015 to 2019, Austrian Airlines’ share of passengers
dropped from 45.6% to 43.2%, respectively. What is the change?
A. -2.4 percentage points
B. 2.4 percentage points
C. -2.4 percent
D. 2.4 percent
E. None of the above.
Consider a government that imposes a personal income tax. It is
estimated that the tax will not affect total labour supplied in the
economy. Given this, the political party advocating for the tax
argue that the tax acts as a non-distortionary, lump-sum tax, and
as such imposes no excess burden. Is this a reasonable
argument?
Consider a government that imposes a personal income tax. It is
estimated that the tax will not affect total labour supplied in the
economy. Given this, the political party advocating for the tax
argue that the tax acts as a non-distortionary, lump-sum tax, and
as such imposes no excess burden. Is this a reasonable
argument?
Suppose that a local government levies an excise tax on hotdog
sellers. Before the tax, 2.5 million hotdogs were sold at a price
of $0.80 per hotdog. With the tax in effect, 1.8 million hotdogs
are sold, consumers pay $0.95 per hotdog, and sellers receive $0.50
per hotdog.
In the scenario above, what is the amount of the tax per
hotdog?
In the scenario above, what percentage of the tax is paid by
buyers?