Question

Short Answer

(a). How might a child who is described as having an insecure versus secure attachment react when his mother returns after having left the room? Please describe both the insecure and secure responses. (b). According to the research on attachment, what are two long-term benefits of a secure attachment style?

Describe one problem or criticism of Piaget’s theory and describe one benefit or good part of his theory.

Answer 1

A)Child with secure attachment would not cry and would feel safe without his mother also. He would be doing fine alone and would be independent. Whereas the child with insecure attachment would not at all feel safe and would always think that his mother has gone forever and will not be coming back . He would cry as soon as his mother goes and he would always be dependent on his mother .

B)The benefits of secure attachment

Research has demonstrated that a secure attachment is the most ideal attachment for sound physical, passionate, scholarly, and social advancement. A safely appended child is interested and active, uninhibitedly ready to investigate his or her condition. A secure attachment significantly encourages learning. People who are securely attached have a tendency to be all the more socially productive and less forceful in their conduct, are more sympathetic, indicate more prominent inventiveness and determination in addressing life's difficulties, take in more effortlessly, and are for the most part better ready to adapt to troubles than are kids who are shakily connected.

C) strength -Piaget energized an extensive training concentrating on the comprehension of children.

Weakness-Piaget neglected to build up a hypothesis for after puberty. Piaget's hypothesis just centered around youngsters along these lines must be compared with specific groups.