Question

In: Finance

Two mutually exclusive alternatives, A and B (both MACRS-GDS 5 year property), are available. Alternative A...

Two mutually exclusive alternatives, A and B (both MACRS-GDS 5 year property), are available. Alternative A requires an original investment of $100,000, has a useful life of 6 years, annual operating costs of $2,500, and a salvage value at the end of year k given by $100,000 (0.70)k. Alternative B requires an original investment of $150,000, has a life of 8 years, zero annual operating costs, and a salvage value at the end of year k given by $150,000(0.80)k. The after-tax MARR is 15% and a 40% tax rate is applicable. Suppose both options involve a loan of 40% of the investment cost, the loan rate is only 2% and the payment follows Plan 1 (pay the accumulated interest at the end of each interest period and pay the principal at the end of the loan period).

Use a planning horizon of 6 years reccomend the least-cost alternative (assume Do Nothing is not possible).

Solutions

Expert Solution

Alternative A

Alternative B

Original investment

100000

150000

Useful life

6

8

Annual operating costs

2500

0

Salvage value

              11,667

(=100000*0.7/6)

20000

(=150000*0.8/6)

Depreciation per annum

              14,722

(=Original investment – salvage value)/useful life

             16,250

Since computation is only for 6 years, useful life of Alt. B is also assumed to be 6 years

Loan (40% of investment)

              40,000

             60,000

Interest on loan (@2%)

                    800

                1,200

Let us calculate net cash outflow each year. It is to be noted that the cash outflow would be net of cash saved due to lower tax. In absence of these expenditures, tax expense would have been higher. Depreciation is a non cash item yet tax is saved on it.

Alternative A

Alternative B

Cash Expenditure:

Interest on loan

                    800

                1,200

Operating expenses

            2500

                  -

                3,300

                1,200

Tax savings (on cash plus non cash depreciation expense at 40%)

                7,209

                6,980

Net cash savings

                3,909

                5,780

Year

Alternative A

PV @ 15% MARR

Alternative B

Year 0: Original investment

-100000

1.0000

-150000

Year 1

                3,399

0.8696

                5,026

Year 2

                2,956

0.7561

                4,371

Year 3

                2,570

0.6575

                3,800

Year 4

                2,235

0.5718

                3,305

Year 5

                1,943

0.4972

                2,874

Year 6

                1,690

0.4323

                2,499

Year 6: Scrap value

                5,044

0.4323

                8,647

Net expenses PV at the end of 6 years

           (80,163)

         (119,479)

Thus, at the end of the 6 year period, Alternative A offers lower cost


Related Solutions

Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the...
Data for two mutually exclusive alternatives are given below. Alternative A Alternative B Initial Cost $4,000...
Data for two mutually exclusive alternatives are given below. Alternative A Alternative B Initial Cost $4,000 $3,000 Annual Benefits (beginning at the end of year 1) $1,000 $600 Annual Costs (beginning at the end of year 1) $300 $100 Salvage Value $500 $0 Useful Life (years) 5 10 Compute the net present worth for each alternative and choose the better alternative. MARR = 6% A. None can be chosen B. Alternative A C. Alternative B D. Any alternative can be...
Consider the following two mutually exclusive cost alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital Investment $8,000 $16,000...
Consider the following two mutually exclusive cost alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital Investment $8,000 $16,000 Annual Expenses $3,500 $3,400 Useful life 8 years 12 years Market value at the end of useful life 0 $3,000 Given MARR is 10% per year, answer the following: Assuming Repeatability applies, determine which alternatives should be selected. b. For a study period of 12 years, and assuming repeatability does not hold for the Alternative A consider there will be an annual contracting cost...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives of A and B have both useful lives of 6 years. For...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives of A and B have both useful lives of 6 years. For Alternative A there is an initial cost of $7,200, and the annual benefits, which is $2,100 for the first year and it increases by $120 each year for the next 5 years. For Alternative B, there is an initial cost of $3000 and the annual benefits, which is $1200 for the first year, and it increases by $100 each year for the next 5...
Projects A and B, both of equal risk, are mutually exclusive alternatives for expanding Corporation’s capacity....
Projects A and B, both of equal risk, are mutually exclusive alternatives for expanding Corporation’s capacity. The firm’s cost of capital is 13%. The cash flows for each project are shown in the following table.                                     Project A                                              Project B                         Year 0:             ($80,000)                     Year 0:             ($80,000)                         Year 1:             $15,000                        Year 1:             $15,000                         Year 2:             $20,000                        Year 2:             $15,000                         Year 3:             $25,000                        Year 3:             $15,000                         Year 4:             $30,000                        Year 4:             $35,000                         Year 5:             $30,000                       ...
Projects A and B, both of equal risk, are mutually exclusive alternatives for expanding Corporation’s capacity....
Projects A and B, both of equal risk, are mutually exclusive alternatives for expanding Corporation’s capacity. The firm’s cost of capital is 13%. The cash flows for each project are shown in the following table.                                     Project A                                              Project B                         Year 0:             ($80,000)                      Year 0:             ($80,000)                         Year 1:             $15,000                        Year 1:             $15,000                         Year 2:             $20,000                        Year 2:             $15,000                         Year 3:             $25,000                        Year 3:             $15,000                         Year 4:             $30,000                        Year 4:             $35,000                         Year 5:             $30,000                        Year 5:            ...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. A decision maker must select one of these alternatives. A B Investment cost $50,000 $30,000 Annual Revenue 15,000 10,000 Salvage value 5,000 3,000 Useful life (yrs.) 5 5 For all parts below, do not convert from another form of equivalent worth; e.g., AW→FW. 1. Compute the AW for Alt A. Based on this measure, should the...
Two mutually exclusive alternative are being considered. Both have lives of 10 years. Alternative A has...
Two mutually exclusive alternative are being considered. Both have lives of 10 years. Alternative A has a fist cost of $10,000 and annual benefits of $4500. Alternative B costs $25,000 and has annual benefits of $8800. If the minimum attractive rate of return is 6%, which alternative should be selected? Solve the problem by a) Present worth analysis. b) Annual cash flow analysis. c) Rate of return analysis.
A manufacturing company is considering two mutually exclusive alternatives. Alternatives                            &nb
A manufacturing company is considering two mutually exclusive alternatives. Alternatives                                    Alt. A         Alt. B Initial cost              $ 42,500    $ 70,000 Annual costs O & M                      $ 6,000       $ 4,000 Annual savings       $ 18,500   $ 20,000 Residual value         $ 12,000   $ 25,000 Shelf life                   3 years   6 years What would be the "advantage" in annual terms of Alternative B versus Alternative A at 15% interest? Select one: a. $ 3020 b. $ 3500 c. $ 7436 d. Alternative B does...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT