Courts stick to objective (reasonable person) standards when evaluating offers and

Courts stick to objective (reasonable person) standards when evaluating offers and acceptances. Juries are not asked to “get inside someone’s head”, they are instructed to determine what a reasonable person would think of offerors’ and offerees’ statements. Is this practice reasonable? Would it be better if the law directly considered whether people wanted to make contracts?

Expert Solution

It is true that it is not possible for jury to get into someone’s head. Court always makes objective assessment when evaluating offers and acceptance. This practice is very much reasonable. The court will always determine the action of offeree.

For example if A offers to sell his pen to B and B shake hands with A, then court will take this action objectively and decides that how a reasonable man can react. The handshake can be taken as positive to the offer and is considered as acceptance.

Court can never peep into the offeror’s or offeree’s head. It cannot be said that B does not want to accept the offer made by B and court should directly considered that what B wants. There are certain situations where court have to look objectively otherwise, most of the contracts contains clear acceptance.

There are certain situations where court have to look objectively otherwise, most of the contracts contains clear acceptance.

Junaid answered 2 years ago

"Reasonable care and skill" in real estate agency duty refers to professional standards a reasonable person...

"Reasonable care and skill" in real estate agency duty refers to professional standards a reasonable person would find adequate. professional standards commonly maintained by other agents in an area. the level of service required of a licensee in any profession. the maximum level of competence a client can expect from an agent. Which of the following accurately characterizes an 'adverse fact?' A property condition fact that was concealed from the buyer A transaction occurrence or fact that adversely affected the...

17–4bEnforceability of Limitation-of-Liability Clauses Learning Objective 5 What is a limitation-of-liability clause, and when will courts...

17–4bEnforceability of Limitation-of-Liability Clauses Learning Objective 5 What is a limitation-of-liability clause, and when will courts enforce it? Whether a limitation-of-liability clause in a contract will be enforced depends on the type of breach that is excused by the provision. Clauses that normally will not be enforced include provisions excluding liability for fraudulent or intentional injury or for illegal acts or other violations of law. Clauses excluding liability for negligence may be enforced in certain situations, however. When an exculpatory...

Each of the following is sometimes listed as a reasonable objective for a firm: (a)maximize profit...

Each of the following is sometimes listed as a reasonable objective for a firm: (a)maximize profit (accounting income), (b) maximize sales (or share of the market), (c)maximize the value of a share of common stock time periods from now, (d) ensure continuity of existence, (e) maximize the rate of growth, (f) maximize future dividends.Discuss each item and the extent of its relevance to the making of investment decisions.

what are accounting standards and discuss its importance? what is the objective of accounting standards?

essay question What factors have courts considered when evaluating factual statements versus opinion-based statements? Could there...

essay question What factors have courts considered when evaluating factual statements versus opinion-based statements? Could there still be liability for purely opinion-based statements?

In 200 words explain....... Reasonable minds can disagree and still be reasonable when it comes to...

In 200 words explain....... Reasonable minds can disagree and still be reasonable when it comes to the Exclusionary Rule. Identify whether you personally are "for" or "against" the Exclusionary Rule and what your reasoning for that opinion is

The objective of financial statement audit The three major categories of assertions The difference between reasonable...

The objective of financial statement audit The three major categories of assertions The difference between reasonable and absolute assurance The management responsibility and the auditor responsibility The various management assertions such as completeness assertion, existence assertion, cutoff assertion, classification and understandability assertion, etc. The relation between management assertions and audit objectives

13-Those auditing standards require that the auditor plans and performs an audit to obtain reasonable assurance...

13-Those auditing standards require that the auditor plans and performs an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of: to SOX the in USA is responsible to prepare additional report about: a – material misstatement b- errors c- fraud d-none of the above 14-“In my opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the company as at .........., 19..... and the results of its operations and the changes in its financial position for the year...

Service delivery models and standards. (with empowerment, person-centred approach, age standards and so on) Word limit...

Service delivery models and standards. (with empowerment, person-centred approach, age standards and so on) Word limit 400

We used FTIR-ATR to determine vinyl acetate from a glue stick using the internal standards method....

We used FTIR-ATR to determine vinyl acetate from a glue stick using the internal standards method. We used the standards with 12, 18, 25, and 40% poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate). The peak height at 1020 cm^-1 is due to the vinyl acetate copolymer (our analyte) and the peak height at 720 cm^-1 is due to the polyethylene (the internal standard). Our unknown is a store-bought glue stick that is EVA-based. We found the peak heights for the standards for the peaks on...

Question