In: Psychology
Compare and contrast Gilligan's view and Kohlberg's view of moral reasoning. Cite examples from the text. (Chapters 11, 12)
Lawrence Kohlberg and Carol Gilligan made significant
contributions to the field of moral reasoning. Both of the views
are very inter-related with Gilligan stating that her view was in
fact an extention of Kohlberg's view and not necessarily a view
against his.
Kohlberg defined 3 stages of moral development which were
subdivided into 2 stages each, givin a total of 6 stages. Kohlberg
came to the conclusion that women would only reach stage 3 whereas
men were consistant at stage 4 and 5. The 3 stages were divided as
- Preconventional Stage (moral judgements are based on fear of
punishment and are purely ego-centric), Conventional Stage
(judgements are made on society's rules and expectations), and Post
Conventional Stage (judgements are based on logic and moral
conduct).
Gilligan was a student of Kohlberg and questioned whether women
were really inferior to men when it came to moral reasoning. She
found out that the tests conducted by Kohlberg were primarily done
on men and there wasnt enough representation of women. Gilligan
conducted her own tests and came out with 3 stages of the same name
but were contrasted in that it included constructs of relationships
and emotions, rather than primary logic. Gilligan's 3 stages are:
Preconventional Stage (importance is given to self survival and
practicality), Conventional Stage (importance is given to
relationships with others), and Post-Conventional Stage (
importance is given to universal truths and a sense of equality
among others).
Thus, though their views are interrelated to each
other, the Care vs. Justice debate continues till
date.