In: Economics
Felix, a U.S. technology company has recently developed a revolutionary wireless phone. The product offers exciting new features along with all of the features of current products, but at a fraction of the manufacturing costs. As the international business manager of Felix, you have been asked to choose the best mode of entry into the European market. Your have the following options: o Export your product from the United States. o Enter into an alliance with a large European company. o Manufacture the product in the United States and set up a wholly owned subsidiary in Europe. o License a European firm to manufacture and market the phone in Europe. In preparation for your choice, list the pros and cons of each method of entry. Which choice do you present to your CEO? Support your decision.
So, the first consideration to launch any product in foreign market is the laws and regulations of the foreign country and also the business environment of the country for example sometimes foreign countries may put non-tariff barriers on its imports like red-tapism and delays in clearances etc. and then it may not remain profitable for an outside firm to launch its product via exports. Considering that all options are open to Felix, let's see pros and cons of different strategies of new product launch:
1. Export the product from the United States:
Pros:
Cons:
2. Enter into an alliance with a large European company:
Pros:
Cons:
3. Manufacture the product in the United States and set up a wholly owned subsidiary in Europe:
Pros:
Cons:
4. License a European firm to manufacture and market the phone in Europe:
Pros:
Cons:
Selecting a strategy depends on number of factors not just related to foreign markets but on internal factors like financial capacity of the firm, Felix, or say risk appetite of the leadership of the firm etc. So, each strategy needs to be evaluated considering both internal as well as external factors. However, given all the information, third strategy i.e. Manufacture the product in the United States and set up a wholly owned subsidiary in Europe is the most suitable in this case because (a). the firm has developed a revolutionary wireless phone which has no competitor and (b). the huge size and potential of European market.