Question

In: Economics

A patient with an incurable, end-of-life condition would assign a QALY score of 0.66 to any...

  1. A patient with an incurable, end-of-life condition would assign a QALY score of 0.66 to any given year spent living in his present state of health. If we assume that the patient is estimated to have three (3) years of life remaining, which among the following statements is true?

Group of answer choices

a. It is obviously not cost-effective to spend any money on end-of-life care for this patient.

b. The patient considers a year of perfect health to be worth the same as 6.6 years of living with his illness.

c. The patient would be willing to sacrifice one of those three remaining years if he could instead live for two years in a state of perfect health.

d. It is not mathematically possible to use QALY scores to answer this type of question.

Solutions

Expert Solution

( c )

The patient would be willing to sacrifice one of those three remaining years if he could instead live for two years in a state of perfect health.

Quality adjusted life years ( QALY ) represents the number of years a person is expected to live after adjusting for the quality of life. The quality of life is adjusted using the QALY score.  QALY score varies between 0 and 1. A perfectly healthy person will have a QALY score of 1.

Number of years remaining for the patient currently = 3

QALY score = 0.66

Utlity for the patient in his remaining life (QALY) = Number of years x QALY score = 3 x 0.66

Utlity for the patient in his remaining life (QALY) = 2

Now consider the situation of the patient if he were to be in perfect health but live only for two years

QALY score for a person in perfect health = 1

Utlity for the patient in his remaining life (QALY) = Number of years x QALY score = 2 x 1

Utlity for the patient in his remaining life (QALY) = 2

As we can see from the above calculations, the life years remaining after adjusting for its quality of life based on QALY score is same in both cases. Therefore, the patient would be willing to sacrifice one of those three remaining years if he could instead live for two years in a state of perfect health.

Rest of the options are wrong since he still has 2 years of quality life remaining with him and thus spending money on his treatment is needed. 2 years of a perfectly healthy life is equal to 3 years of his current life. We use the QALY scores and mathematically determine the equivalency conditions.

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago
Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Determine when it would be appropriate to discuss palliative and end-of-life care with your geriatric patient...
Determine when it would be appropriate to discuss palliative and end-of-life care with your geriatric patient who has presented with one of the common aging syndromes. During which visit and at what time during the visit would you have this discussion
In what real life research situations would you use a z-score? t-score? when would we know...
In what real life research situations would you use a z-score? t-score? when would we know the population standard deviation? When would we not know the population standard deviation?
For this discussion, your instructor will assign you to Patient A or Patient B. Patient A...
For this discussion, your instructor will assign you to Patient A or Patient B. Patient A is a 22-year-old female survivor of Stage II Hodgkin lymphoma treated with radiation and chemotherapy. Patient B is a 60-year-old male survivor of colon cancer treated with a colon resection and sigmoid colostomy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. For your assigned patient: Identify 2 interventions the nurse will include on the survivorship plan of care that will address health promotion and management of comorbid conditions....
The doctor prescribes her patient a treatment for a non-life-threatening condition. The doctor argues that this...
The doctor prescribes her patient a treatment for a non-life-threatening condition. The doctor argues that this is a useful allocation of health care resources because the treatment will improve the patient’s quality of life. A health economist disagrees with the doctor and says the treatment, in this particular case, is a wasteful use of resources. Explain each the doctor’s and the economist’s perspectives applying marginal analysis.
The doctor prescribes her patient a treatment for a non-life-threatening condition. The doctor argues that this...
The doctor prescribes her patient a treatment for a non-life-threatening condition. The doctor argues that this is a useful allocation of health care resources because the treatment will improve the patient’s quality of life. A health economist disagrees with the doctor and says the treatment, in this particular case, is a wasteful use of resources. Explain each the doctor’s and the economist’s perspectives applying marginal analysis.
The family of a patient about to remove the patient from life support. What would be...
The family of a patient about to remove the patient from life support. What would be appropriate interventions ?
Calculate the standard score (Z-Score) and indicate where the Z-Score would be on a Standard Normal...
Calculate the standard score (Z-Score) and indicate where the Z-Score would be on a Standard Normal Distribution (draw the normal distribution) μ = 85 and σ = 15; x = 110 μ = 120 and σ = 12.5; x = 80 μ = 100 and σ = 20; x = 118
Create a Mock CBC for the following condition Condition: Essential Thrombocythemia CBC PARAMETER PATIENT RESULTS Precursors...
Create a Mock CBC for the following condition Condition: Essential Thrombocythemia CBC PARAMETER PATIENT RESULTS Precursors WBC RBC HGB HCT MCV MCHC RDW MPV PLAT Neutrophils % Lymphs % Monos % Eos % Baso % Significant findings that could be present on the differential smear: WBC: RBC: PLAT: Testing to confirm: What are the CD markers and cytogenetic abnormalities? Any relevant cytochemical stains?
Create a mock CBC for the following condition Condition: Multiple myeloma CBC PARAMETER PATIENT RESULTS Precursors...
Create a mock CBC for the following condition Condition: Multiple myeloma CBC PARAMETER PATIENT RESULTS Precursors WBC RBC HGB HCT MCV MCHC RDW MPV PLAT Neutrophils % Lymphs % Monos % Eos % Baso % Significant findings that could be present on the differential smear: WBC: RBC: PLAT: Testing to confirm: What are the CD markers and cytogenetic abnormalities? Any relevant cytochemical stains? Other tests? How is Multiple Myeloma different from Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia? How do Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma differ?...
We end with leadership, which many would argue should be at the start of any organization....
We end with leadership, which many would argue should be at the start of any organization. 1. Discuss the importance of leadership behaviors in effective strategy implementation. 2. What qualities and behaviors do you believe are most important in a leader relevant to strategy implementation. If applicable, include your personal experiences. Please number each response and provide one space between responses
ADVERTISEMENT
Subjects
ADVERTISEMENT
Latest Questions
ADVERTISEMENT