Which is more important—to ensure that only relevant and probative evidence is admitted into court OR...

Which is more important—to ensure that only relevant and probative evidence is admitted into court OR to ensure that irrelevant, unreliable, and prejudicial evidence is excluded from the courtroom? Explain your answer.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Ans

To ensure that only relevant and probative evidence is admitted into court is more important because they are admissible in the courtroom. Before starting a legal proceeding, a judge has to ascertain that if evidence is relevant with respect to case. Therefore, if we exclude irrelevant, unreliable, and prejudicial evidence is excluded from the courtroom the it will streamline the proceedings, and judge time will be saved from unnecesary task of determining if the evidence is correct or not.

Hi mate,

I would be grateful to you if you can provide a thumbs up and write one beautiful comment. It will improve my rating and let me continue my journey here.

In case of doubt, please comment. I will consider myself fortunate if I can help you.

All the best for your bright future.

Be safe from corona. Wear a mask before going out and wash hands frequently especially before touching face

ekkarill92 answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

1. Which ONE of the following defendants is the only one in which a state court...

1. Which ONE of the following defendants is the only one in which a state court would absolutely be able to exercise in personam jurisdiction (without having to have additional information to make a determination)? a. An individual who is traveling through a state and allegedly causes damage while there. b.A business that is incorporated in somewhere in the United States. c. A business with manufacturing and distribution facilities located in multiple states throughout the country. d. An individual who...

Which of the following statements is false? a)The evidence seems to show that there are only...

Which of the following statements is false? a)The evidence seems to show that there are only a few, if any, instances of pure monopsony in the real world. b)In a monopsony setting, it is possible for a minimum wage to actually increase the number of workers hired. c)Although in a monopsony setting it is possible for a minimum wage to actually increase the number of workers hired, it is not possible to raise wage rates continually and always increase employment,...

In the court finding of facts dated November 5, 1999, what evidence did the court cite...

In the court finding of facts dated November 5, 1999, what evidence did the court cite in claiming that Microsoft charged above-competitive prices (see "Microsoft's Pricing Behavior")

Explain the difference between representative and relevant evidence?

Explain Audit Evidence in particular (i) Sufficient Audit Evidence (ii) Relevant Audit Evidence (iii) ...

Explain Audit Evidence in particular (i) Sufficient Audit Evidence (ii) Relevant Audit Evidence (iii) Reliable Audit Evidence

MR X claims that the relevant range concept is important only for variable costs. I. Explain...

MR X claims that the relevant range concept is important only for variable costs. I. Explain the relevant range concept. II. Do you agree with Mr X claim? Explain. III. “The relevant range is indispensable in cost behavioranalysis.” Is this true? Why or why not?

Write a scenario in which a patient is admitted with two or more interrelated conditions. Provide...

Write a scenario in which a patient is admitted with two or more interrelated conditions. Provide the codes you used, and include the steps followed for locating the diagnoses.

According to the case of Cobbs v. Grant, the court said there was not enough evidence...

According to the case of Cobbs v. Grant, the court said there was not enough evidence to support a verdict of negligence, yet the original gastrectomy led to multiple hospital stays and two follow-up surgeries. These complications were known risks that can occur even if the surgeon performs the operation flawlessly. If you were the patient and knew about these risks, would you have decide to consent to the first surgery? What factors would you consider?

Which factors important in choosing a retail site would not be relevant to a manufacturing site—and...

Which factors important in choosing a retail site would not be relevant to a manufacturing site—and vice versa?

Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...

Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...

Subjects