In: Operations Management
Rules of Evidence
Under the rules of evidence, a judge may exclude relevant
evidence for a...
Rules of Evidence
- Under the rules of evidence, a judge may exclude relevant
evidence for a variety of reasons. Which of the following is a
situation where a judge can refuse to admit relevant evidence?
- The evidence is unduly prejudicial
- The evidence is hypothetical
- The evidence might be offensive
- The evidence is narrative
- ________________ is defined as anything perceptible by the
fives senses and any proof legally presented at trial to prove a
contested issue and induce a belief in the mind of the jury.
- Testimony
- Point of law
- Evidence
- Hearsay
- Evidence that proves or disproves facts in issue indirectly, by
inference, is called:
- Circumstantial evidence
- Direct evidence
- Relevant evidence
- Demonstrative evidence
- An attorney may impeach an opposing party’s witness by
showing/proving that the witness:
- Has been convicted of a misdemeanor
- Made prior consistence statements
- Has a reputation for truthfulness
- Is influenced by bias or self-interest
- ________________ refers to a document or process that
memorializes who has had possession of an object and what they have
done with it.
- Authenticity
- Chain of custody
- Forensic examination form
- Litigation hold
- Harris is retained by legal counsel to provide an opinion
involving specialized knowledge in the accounting field for a jury
trial. Which of the following best describes his role.
- A fact witness
- A counseling expert
- A non-adversarial witness
- An expert witness
- Evidence that tends to make some fact in issue more or less
likely than it would be without the evidence is called:
- Relevant evidence
- Authenticated evidence
- Direct evidence
- Real evidence
- The exclusionary rule:
- Prohibits a party from testifying about the contents of a
document without producing the document itself
- Refers to the warnings advising suspects that they have the
right not to answer questions and the right to legal counsel during
interrogations
- Provides that, if the government violates an individual’s
constitutional rights during a criminal investigation, it cannot
prosecute the person whose rights were violated.
- Provides that, if the evidence is unconstitutionally seized,
that evidence cannot be used in a criminal prosecution against the
person whose rights were violate
Evaluating Deception
- Black, a Certified Fraud Examiner, is interviewing a person
whose honesty and truthfulness is unknown. Which of the following
responses to a question by Black does NOT indicate a deceptive
answer?
- “Please repeat the question.”
- “Let me see, now.”
- Why would I do that?”
- “I didn’t do it.”
- Which of the following is likely to produce the most reliable
behavioral symptoms?
- Mentally unstable subjects
- Juvenile subjects
- Highly intelligent subjects
- Subjects under the influence of drugs
- Which is the most likely to be the answer of an honest person
when accused of a wrongdoing?
- “I’m sorry, sir, but I didn’t do it.”
- “No!”
- “I didn’t take the $400,000 on March 15
- “But I couldn’t have don’t it. I don’t have necessary
access.”
this is for fraud in corporate responsibility