Question

In: Economics

brief the court decision entitled United States v. Hamilton, __4th Ct. App. __ 2012 

brief the court decision entitled United States v. Hamilton, __4th Ct. App. __ 2012 

Solutions

Expert Solution

United States v. Hamilton 4th Ct. App. (2012)

Facts:-

Challenging the District Court’s admission of e-mails sent and received to his wife violated the marital communications privilege .

Government maintains marital communication was waived when e-mailing his wife through the work e-mail account using a work computer and failing to safeguard the e-mails.

In 2006, when using his workplace computer to send e-mails to his wife, there was no computer usage policy, therefore claiming marital communication privilege (Id).

Legal Issues:-

Whether the Government violated martial communication privilege.

Holding:-

Judgments of the District is Affirmed.

Rationale:

                “We reviewed evidentially rulings, including rulings on privilege, for abuse of discretion, factual findings, as to whether a privilege applies for clear error and application of clear principals de novo”.   

Martial communication must be made confidential and by e-mailing from a work email account from a work computer, Hamilton waived his right of marital privilege Id.

The school revised the computer policy in 2008 which expressly stated, “no expectation of privacy in their use of the Computer System and all information created or sent, received, access, or stored in the Computer System is subject inspection and monitoring at any time”. This policy was enacted well before the investigation and charges brought against him as he was already on notice for his computer usage; therefore, waving marital privilege (Id).


Related Solutions

In Dred Scott v. Stanford, the United States Supreme Court held that slaves were not entitled...
In Dred Scott v. Stanford, the United States Supreme Court held that slaves were not entitled to file suit in federal courts because they were not citizens. Select one: True False
In the Skilling v. United States 130 S. Ct. 2896 (2010), what did the court hold...
In the Skilling v. United States 130 S. Ct. 2896 (2010), what did the court hold regarding "honest services"?
brief case of united states v. liebo, united states court of appeals, eight circuit, 1991,923 F.2d...
brief case of united states v. liebo, united states court of appeals, eight circuit, 1991,923 F.2d 1308
brief the court decision entitled Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc., 655 S.E.2d, 362 (N.C. 2008)
brief the court decision entitled Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc., 655 S.E.2d, 362 (N.C. 2008)
United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)
United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)
Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) United States v. Bestfoods 113...
Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) United States v. Bestfoods 113 F.3d 572 (1998) SOUTER, JUSTICE The United States brought this action under §107(a)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) against, among others, respondent CPC International, Inc., the parent corporation of the defunct Ott Chemical Co. (Ott II), for the costs of cleaning up industrial waste generated by Ott II’s chemical plant. Section 107(a)(2) authorizes suits against, among others,...
CASE: HAROLD DAVIS and ENID DAVIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee UNITED STATES COURT...
CASE: HAROLD DAVIS and ENID DAVIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 861 F.2d 558 November 14, 1988 Plaintiff-appellants Harold and Enid Davis claimed charitable deductions under IRC section 170 for funds they sent to their two sons for their support while they served as full-time unpaid missionaries for the Church of Jesus Christ of LatterDay-Saints at the New York City Mission and at the New Zealand/Cook Islands Mission. These...
Tax Court decisions determined in Johnson v. United States. Do you agree or disagree with the...
Tax Court decisions determined in Johnson v. United States. Do you agree or disagree with the Tax Court's decision? Why or why not?.
Prepare a comprehensive and thumbnail brief of each of the following opinions: United States v. Kovel...
Prepare a comprehensive and thumbnail brief of each of the following opinions: United States v. Kovel Brown v. Hammond
Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) Is direct liability for a...
Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) Is direct liability for a parent company's operation of the facility distinct from derivative liability for the subsidiary's operation of the facility?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT