SOC- P: How do Wright's model of social class and Gilbert and
Kahl's model of social...
SOC- P: How do Wright's model of social class and Gilbert and
Kahl's model of social class fit within this ideal society and does
the society require different social classes? Why or why not?
Solutions
Expert Solution
Industrialization in America transformed the society to be
populated due to improved technology and development of
corporations. The three class structures were established where
upper class consisted of monopolies as well as businesspersons who
exploited employees because of the corruption in the government.
Those in the middle class influenced the corporations to
concentrate on the benefit that would be received from the owners
of small businesses.
The lower class struggled due to harsh treatment and poor
working conditions but they led to the change in the government as
well as monopolies. Even if industrialization was influenced by the
upper class since they had a lot of freedom, the lower and middle
classes influenced through ensuring that they survive and could not
follow the corporations who had their rules.
According to Dennis Gilbert, some households earn more income
than others can if they increase number of those who are capable of
earning income. The size of household is very important because if
they combine their income, it becomes higher. The focus of Gilbert
Kohl is income where people are classified according to the
economic system. When a person gets quality education, the
occupation is better and the level of class rises.
Gilbert Kohl model of social class uses the system of economy
in development of structure of classes.
Capitalist class consists of people who relate with people whom
they belong to the same class and avoid the inferior class.
The upper middle class is made up of professionals as well as
managers who have formal education and they succeed from the type
of jobs that they do.
The middle class are semi professionals who receive training
after college education.
Working class are operators of machines who are semi skilled
and includes sales people as well as clerks.
The classes of working poor are unskilled laborers and their
payment is very low, they do not have savings and depend on
pensions after retirement.
The underclass suffers from unemployment, they lack self-esteem
and their level of education is very low.
The distinctions between class of people result from economic
differences. Some people in the society are ranked as being
socially inferior or socially superior because of income, the level
of wealth, interaction patterns as well as occupation. Those who
belong to the same class interact together where they have similar
values.
Parents assign status to their children due to the income that
flow to the ancestors. The upper class has enough wealth, own big
houses but the family had to have the wealth for one generation or
more. Middle class are successful moderately and consist of
businesspersons with morals like that of fundamentalism. Lower
class is the people who do not have any trouble, are laboring and
rely on public relief.
Erik Wright identified four classes: capitalists, petty
bourgeoisie, managers, and workers.
Capitalists (owners of large enterprises); petty bourgeoisie
(owners of
small businesses); managers (employees who have authority over
others); and workers.
The exploitation-centered concept of class provides a framework
for linking the microlevel question about explaining individual
material conditions and interests with the macro-level question
about historical variation and the normative question about
emancipatory transformation. What needs changing in capitalism is a
system of property relations that confers power on capitalists and
enables them to exploit and oppress others.
These theories indicate that social classes are inevitable part
of our life.As much as we focus on equal treatment,the fact remains
that these classes do exist in our society and we cannot escape
them.
Some have considered class a “necessary evil” and most social
theories assume that having classes is, in itself, unfair and a
“bad thing”. But there is no example of a successful (sustainable
and growing) society which has not had social classes of some
kind.
Classes will appear as a natural consequence of humans being
gregarious. The real solution, which may well have to be a dynamic
solution to fit the times, is to design the class system to be
used, rather than let it appear by default. Most of the perceived
injustices of class are connected to either the classes being
hereditary or because movement between the classes is
forbidden.
The real question is what attributes to use in defining classes
which help a society to function and which are not unjust. It
cannot be along just hereditary lines and it cannot be just based
on wealth.
However any class system must be able to accommodate the
realities of ancestry and wealth. Parents will always seek to give
their children an advantage and wealth will always be able to
purchase more.
Whatever classes we invent must be capable of juxtaposing
different levels of wealth within each class and must allow
membership from any parentage. It should be possible to move from
one class to another.
Emile Durkheim argued in the Division of Labor (or Labour) in
Society (1893) that people differ in ability, and that these
abilities lead us to take on a different role in the labor force.
Thus, some people will be turning screws and some people will be
managing others.
Durkheim, for his part, seemed to think that this division was
going to be awesome for everyone because all people could be part
of a larger whole—the manager and the screw-turner both contribute
in their own unique way toward making an automobile.
However, one of the consequences of a division of labor is that
some people are going to have better jobs than others, more freedom
and autonomy in their work, and also, more respect, prestige, and
status.
Social groups can gain benefits from having divisions of
labor—they increase productivity by allowing people to specialize
their skills.So, I guess whether our society needs them or not,it
will continue to exist.
Briefly describe each level of the social class ladder. Which
area of the social class do you fall into? What are the
characteristics that define this part of the social class ladder?
Assignment should be 2 full paragraphs
1. (a) Define social class. How is social class different for
the other systems of stratification such as slavery and caste? (b)
There are three sociological perspectives on stratification.
Structural Functionalism (Davis and Moore 1945); Conflict Theory
(Marx and Engels); Max Weber’s three-part theory—define each of the
elements. Briefly summarize each of these theories.
SOC-P: What are the benefits and drawbacks of belonging to a
group (primary groups, secondary groups, reference groups, formal
groups, in-groups, and out-groups) and how do people conform to
groups?
Soc 105 W10
Discuss the influence of social media on middle age and senior
adults. Support your views with one or two reasons and/or
examples.
Discuss effects of social media on your relationship and
communication with others. Support your reflections with one or two
examples.
Define social class. Identify three criteria used to conceptualize
social class placement.
Define social stratification and discuss the four systems of
social stratification.