Question

In: Economics

Q29: Which of these allowed the Justice Department to enforce non-discriminatory employment practices? - Rehabilitation Act...

Q29: Which of these allowed the Justice Department to enforce non-discriminatory employment practices?

- Rehabilitation Act of 1973

- Voting Rights Act of 1965

- Equal Rights Amendment of 1972

- Civil Rights Act of 1964

Q30: What is the "equal protection clause"?

- part of the 15th amendment that established the separate but equal rule

- part of the 14th amendment that abolished slavery

- part of the 15th amendment that guarantees voting rights for black men

- part of the 14th amendment that guarantees civil rights to each citizen

Q31: What was established with the court case Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)?

- that each citizen is guaranteed equal protection under law.

- that the Justice Department can issue federal court orders to desegregate schools.

- that segregation of the races in public accommodations is allowed as long as the facilities are equal.

- that racial discrimination violates the Constitution.

Q32: What was the consequence of the decision in the 1954 case Brown v. Board of Education?

- Public Schools were allowed to have separate facilities for different races as long as those facilities were equal

- Racial segregation in public schools ended immediately across the country.

- Separate public education facilities for different races was deemed inherently unequal and unconstitutional

- racial segregation in public schools ended within a year in the south

Solutions

Expert Solution

29. Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Explanation :

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 allowed the justice department to enforce non-discriminatory employment practices. This act prevents discrimination of any form in the workplace of individuals on the grounds of color, race, sex, religion etc. This act also prohibits any form of discrimination on the above mentioned grounds in hiring or recruiting employees, offering them promotions, or firing them from working further.

30. Part of the 14th amendment that guarantees civil rights to each citizen.

Explanation :

"Equal protection clause" is part of the 14th amendment that guarantees civil rights to each citizen emphasizing on equal protection by law and that state shall not deny or enforce any law depriving any individual from any privileges or immunity of being a citizen of the nation. It was the equal protection clause which was the part of 13th amendment that abolished slavery.

31. That segregation of the races in public accommodations is allowed as long as the facilities are equal.

Explanation :

The declaration of supreme Court in the court case Plessy v Ferguson (1896) legalized segregation as long as equal facilities in public accommodations are made available to the black and white races,as equal facilities were made available to them the Supreme Court held that it didn't violate amendment 14 of the Constitution, thus making 'equal but separate' legal.

32. Separate public education facilities for different races was deemed inherently unequal and unconstitutional.

Explanation :

The consequence of the decision of 1954 case Brown v. Board of Education was that in public schools segregation of children on the basis of race was inherently unconstitutional and against law and even though equal facilities are being provided to the races. Thus, it declared 'equal but separate' rule unconstitutional.


Related Solutions

Recently, the department of justice allowed a merger between T-Mobile and sprint, but is is suing...
Recently, the department of justice allowed a merger between T-Mobile and sprint, but is is suing so that a proposed merger between AT&T and Time Warner will not go through. Why do you think the DOJ approves T-Mobile/sprint merger but not the AT&T/ Time Warner merger?
Some people believe the The Equal Employment Opportunity act of 1972 has created unfair practices with...
Some people believe the The Equal Employment Opportunity act of 1972 has created unfair practices with the Criminal Justice System. Do you feel this is true? If so, Explain. If not, Explain. Remember to give examples of your statements. There is no right or wrong answer here. It is only your opinion. Feel free to play devil’s advocate in debating the issues. It does not mean you believe in the issue, you are just debating it.
Which of the following practices is not allowed by International Financial Reporting Standards? Use of the...
Which of the following practices is not allowed by International Financial Reporting Standards? Use of the closing exchange rate for the translation of the statement of profit or loss of a foreign subsidiary Accounting for incorporated joint ventures using the equity method. Accounting for changes in accounting policy by restating comparatives and adjusting the prior year opening retained earnings Recognising actuarial gains and losses in other comprehensive income
In the Clean Air Act as amended, Congress allowed California, which has serious problems with air...
In the Clean Air Act as amended, Congress allowed California, which has serious problems with air quality, to adopt its own standards for emissions from cars and trucks, subject to the approval of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) according to certain standards. The Act also allowed other states to adopt California’s standards after EPA approval. In 2004, California adopted emissions standards for all new passenger vehicles and lightduty trucks sold in California beginning in 2009. The standards imposed decreasing limits...
Which Act below allowed states to make home and community-based services part of their Medicaid programs...
Which Act below allowed states to make home and community-based services part of their Medicaid programs directly, without having to receive waivers. Deficit Reduction OBRA of 1987 ACA None of the above
Procedural law defines the conditions under which justice actors must act. Substantive law defines crime and...
Procedural law defines the conditions under which justice actors must act. Substantive law defines crime and punishment for that crime. Which of these - procedural or substantive - do we emphasize in our constitution and why would we have made that choice?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT