Harrod Domar Model Of Economic Growth
:
Introduction-
It is a Keynesian idealistic model, which was initially
propounded by Roy F. Harrod in 1939 and than by Evsey Domar in 1946
,it is somewhere from the exogenous growth models outlook
Assumptions-
- Full employment exists
- No government intervention
- Marginal and average propensity are equal
- No lags in adjustment
- Saving and capital coefficient are constant
- Depreciation is cost of replacement
Features -
It said Economic growth depends upon
- Level of saving - he believed that higher the saving higher
will be the investment
- Capital output ratio - for higher economic growth this ratio
needs to be low so that investment can be efficient
Concepts -
- Warranted growth rate - this is when all saving is absorbed in
investment
- Natural growth rate - that growth rate which is needed to
maintain full employment
Graphical presentation -
as per graph
- S(Y) - saving corresponding to various income levels at
I0,I1,I2 ,which are different levels of investment
- Y0P0 and Y1P1 - capital productivity at various investment
levels
- Rise in income - on productivity of capital that is measures by
slope of Y0P0 , higher the slope higher the productivity
- That is if initially the level of income is OY1 so saving is
Y0S1,which becomes future investment and raise income level to OY2
.
- Role of economic growth = saving ÷ capital output
Importance-
like a cycle Higher Capital stock -> higher economic growth
-> more saving -> more investment than again more capital
stock
Criticism -
- Did not support much in developing countries as for them to
rise level of saving was a big task
- It is short term model
- Without saving nations like Thailand has achieved growth
- Exaggerate importance of capital to have growth
- Many times more capital stock can have less returns
- Ignores labor productivity and technological innovation
- LEWIS MODEL : as it has no savings ,here profits earned from
surplus labor is been reinvested in business to increase
productivity and to have more outcomes that is because of LESSER
WAGE . CHARACTER - a) moving from agriculture to modern society
i.e. a transition ,b)growth is when labor moves from low
productivity agriculture to high productive industrial sector ,c)
with surplus labor in agriculture ,the industry does not raise its
wage and from those profits it gets investment and earn more d)
this happens till surplus labor is absorbed. CRITISM - To have more
productivity cycle does not go on and on . There needs a shift from
less productive to more
Conclusion:
Both are growth models wherein Lewis has widen the horizon to
actually achieve growth. As labor itself is not just improving
niether investing in same picture helps but the place of work also
effects and also there is an upliftment. Not just mere growth ,
upliftment is from being in rural before than getting urbanised