In: Psychology
If a person does not understand a law or was unaware of that law can they still be charged the same way as someone that was aware of the law and knowingly broke the law? There are some laws that can be unclear, what if a law was just misunderstood by a person?
2. Do you think our free speech laws should be changed in any way? Currently a person can say anything to anyone that is not a threat on that person. Should there be laws against not spreading lies publicly, or is this something that should not be policed?
1. It is the duty of a responsible citizen to understand laws and to keep in mind the laws. If any one admits that he is unaware of law, then there would not be any mercy because any person can intentionally say that he is not aware of laws. In such case it would be difficult to maintain law. Therefore it can never be a matter of consideration whether the individuals are aware of law or not. Those who are aware of laws and those who are not aware of laws should be treated equally.
2. There are enough explanation regarding the rights if speech. In the law it is said that one can freely express his opinion. But it has also been said that the opinion must be impartial. It should not be used to hurt anyone. The freedom of speech should be used in such ways that it does not raise any controversy. It should not be used as a racism or discrimination.
Besides, our social norms, moral education and ethical duty say that we should not use any discriminatory speech or indecent words. Our early education and social norms make us aware about the use of words. Naturally there is no vague ideas or lack of clarity in the laws regarding the freedom of speech.