In: Finance
Billingham Packaging is considering expanding its production capacity by purchasing a new machine, the XC-750. The cost of the XC-750 is $2.75 million. Unfortunately, installing this machine will take several months and will partially disrupt production. The firm has just completed a $50,000 feasibility study to analyze the decision to buy the XC-750, resulting in the following estimates:
■ Marketing: Once the XC-750 is operating next year, the extra capacity is expected to generate $10 million per year in additional sales, which will continue for the ten-year life of the machine.
■ Operations: The disruption caused by the installation will decrease sales by $5 million this year. As with Billingham’s existing products, the cost of goods for the products produced by the XC-750 is expected to be 70% of their sale price. The increased production will also require increased inventory on hand of $1 million during the life of the project. The increased production will require additional inventory of $1M, to be added in year 0 and depleted in year 10.
■ Human Resources: The expansion will require additional sales and administrative personnel at a cost of $2 million per year.
■ Accounting: The XC-750 will be depreciated via the straight-line method in years 1–10. Receivables are expected to be 15% of revenues and payables to be 10% of the cost of goods sold. Billingham’s marginal corporate tax rate is 15%.
a. Determine the incremental earnings from the purchase of the XC- 750. (NOPAT)
b. Determine the free cash flow from the purchase of the XC-750.
c. If the appropriate cost of capital for the expansion is 10%, compute the NPV of the purchase.
d. While the expected new sales will be $10 million per year from the expansion, estimates range from $8 million to $12 million. What is the NPV in the worst case? In the best case?
e. What is the break-even level of new sales from the expansion? What is the break-even level for the cost of goods sold?
f. Billingham could instead purchase the XC-900, which offers even greater capacity. The cost of the XC-900 is $4 million. The extra capacity would not be useful in the first two years of operation, but would allow for additional sales in years 3–10. What level of additional sales (above the $10 million expected for the XC-750) per year in those years would justify purchasing the larger machine?
NEED D, E, and F!! Show work.
$50000 spent on feasibility study is a sunk cost and not relevant | ||||||
a | Incremental Earnings | |||||
Year2-11 | ||||||
A | Additional Sales per year | $10,000,000 | ||||
B=A*70% | Cost of goods (70%) | $7,000,000 | ||||
C | Incremental Sales & Admin Cost | $2,000,000 | ||||
D | Annual Depreciation=2.75 million/10 | $275,000 | ||||
E=A-B-C-D | Before Tax Incremental Earnings year2-11 | $725,000 | ||||
F=E*(1-0.15) | After Tax Incremental earning Year2-11 | $616,250 | (725000*(1-0.15) | |||
Year1 | ||||||
Decrease in Sales | $5,000,000 | |||||
Cost of goods (70%) | $3,500,000 | |||||
Before Tax Incremental Earning Year1 | ($1,500,000) | |||||
After Tax Incremental earning Year1 | ($1,275,000) | (-1500000*(1-0.15) | ||||
b | Free Cash Flow: | |||||
Year0 | ||||||
Cost of machine | ($2,750,000) | |||||
Inventory | ($1,000,000) | |||||
Total Free Cash Flow in Year0 | ($3,750,000) | |||||
Year1 | ||||||
After Tax Incremental earning Year1 | ($1,275,000) | |||||
Increase in receivables=15%*10million | -$1,500,000 | |||||
Increase in Payables=10%*7000000 | $700,000 | |||||
Free Cash Flow- Year1 | ($2,075,000) | |||||
Free Cash flowYear 2-10 | ||||||
After Tax Incremental earning | $616,250 | |||||
Add:Depreciation | $275,000 | |||||
Free Cash Flow- Year2-10 | $891,250 | |||||
Free Cash Flow in Year11 | ||||||
After Tax Incremental earning | $616,250 | |||||
Add:Depreciation | $275,000 | |||||
Release of working capital (Inventory) | $1,000,000 | |||||
Release of working capital (Receivable& Payables) | $800,000 | (1500000-700000) | ||||
Free Cash Flow in Year11 | $2,691,250 | |||||
C . CALCULATION OF NPV | ||||||
Present Value of Cash Flow=(Cash Flow)/((1+i)^N) | ||||||
i=discount rate=10%=0.1, N=Year of Cash flow | ||||||
N | FCF | PV=FCF/(1.1^N) | ||||
Year | Free Cash Flow | Present Value | ||||
0 | ($3,750,000) | ($3,750,000) | ||||
1 | ($2,075,000) | ($1,886,364) | ||||
2 | $891,250 | $736,570 | ||||
3 | $891,250 | $669,609 | ||||
4 | $891,250 | $608,736 | ||||
5 | $891,250 | $553,396 | ||||
6 | $891,250 | $503,087 | ||||
7 | $891,250 | $457,352 | ||||
8 | $891,250 | $415,775 | ||||
9 | $891,250 | $377,977 | ||||
10 | $891,250 | $343,615 | ||||
11 | $2,691,250 | $943,267 | ||||
SUM | ($26,979) | |||||
Net Present Value=NPV=Sum of PV | ($26,979) | |||||
|