In: Finance
Billingham Packaging is considering expanding its production capacity by purchasing a new machine, the XC-750. The cost of the XC-750 is $2.83 million. Unfortunately, installing this machine will take several months and will partially disrupt production. The firm has just completed a $47,000 feasibility study to analyze the decision to buy the XC-750, resulting in the following estimates:
• Marketing: Once the XC-750 is operational next year, the extra capacity is expected to generate $10.10 million per year in additional sales, which will continue for the 10-year life of the machine.
• Operations: The disruption caused by the installation will decrease sales by $4.93 million this year. As with Billingham's existing products, the cost of goods for the products produced by the XC-750 is expected to be 72% of their sale price. The increased production will also require increased inventory on hand of $1.18 million during the life of the project, including year 0.
• Human Resources: The expansion will require additional sales and administrative personnel at a cost of $2.05 million per year.
• Accounting: The XC-750 will be depreciated via the straight-line method over the 10-year life of the machine. The firm expects receivables from the new sales to be 16% of revenues and payables to be 10% of the cost of goods sold. Billingham's marginal corporate tax rate is 21%.
a. Determine the incremental earnings from the purchase of the XC-750.
b. Determine the free cash flow from the purchase of the XC-750.
c. If the appropriate cost of capital for the expansion is 9.6%, compute the NPV of the purchase.
d. While the expected new sales will be $10.10 million per year from the expansion, estimates range from $8.05 million to $12.15 million. What is the NPV in the worst case? In the best case?
e. What is the break-even level of new sales from the expansion? What is the breakeven level for the cost of goods sold?
f. Billingham could instead purchase the XC-900, which offers even greater capacity. The cost of the XC-900 is $4.02 million. The extra capacity would not be useful in the first two years of operation, but would allow for additional sales in years 3 through 10. What level of additional sales (above the $10.10 million expected for the XC-750) per year in those years would justify purchasing the larger machine?
a]
incremental earnings before tax = additional sales - cost of goods sold - additional costs - depreciation
incremental earnings after tax = incremental earnings before tax - taxes
b]
Operating cash flow (FCF) each year = incremental income after tax + depreciation
FCF in year 0 = -(cost of machine + increase in inventory + incremental income after tax)
Decrease in contribution in year 0 = decreased sales * (1 – cost of goods %)
The amount spent on feasibility study is a sunk cost as it is incurred in the past, and cannot be recovered. It should not be considered in the incremental cash flow analysis.
FCF in year 2 = OCF – increase in NWC (net working capital)
Increase in NWC = increase in accounts receivable – increase in accounts payable
FCF in years 2 to 9 = OCF
FCF in year 10 = OCF + terminal cash flow
Terminal cash flow = recovery of inventory + recovery of NWC
c]
NPV is calculated using NPV function in Excel
NPV is -$376,740
d]
NPV in the worst case is -$3,219,313
NPV in the best case is $2,465,833