In: Finance
Billingham Packaging is considering expanding its production capacity by purchasing a new machine, the XC-750. The cost of the XC-750 is $ 2.76 million. Unfortunately, installing this machine will take several months and will partially disrupt production. The firm has just completed a $ 45,000 feasibility study to analyze the decision to buy the XC-750, resulting in the following estimates: bullet Marketing: Once the XC-750 is operational next year, the extra capacity is expected to generate $ 10.00 million per year in additional sales, which will continue for the 10-year life of the machine. bullet Operations: The disruption caused by the installation will decrease sales by $ 5.01 million this year. As with Billingham's existing products, the cost of goods for the products produced by the XC-750 is expected to be 68 % of their sale price. The increased production will also require increased inventory on hand of $ 1.11 million during the life of the project, including year 0. bullet Human Resources: The expansion will require additional sales and administrative personnel at a cost of $ 2.09 million per year. bullet Accounting: The XC-750 will be depreciated via the straight-line method over the 10-year life of the machine. The firm expects receivables from the new sales to be 14 % of revenues and payables to be 10 % of the cost of goods sold. Billingham's marginal corporate tax rate is 35 %.
a. Determine the incremental earnings from the purchase of the XC-750.
b. Determine the free cash flow from the purchase of the XC-750.
c. If the appropriate cost of capital for the expansion is 9.8%, compute the NPV of the purchase.
d. While the expected new sales will be $10.00 million per year from the expansion, estimates range from $7.95 million to $12.05 million. What is the NPV in the worst case? In the best case?
e. What is the break-even level of new sales from the expansion? What is the breakeven level for the cost of goods sold?
f. Billingham could instead purchase the XC-900, which offers even greater capacity. The cost of the XC-900 is $4.09 million. The extra capacity would not be useful in the first two years of operation, but would allow for additional sales in years 3 through 10. What level of additional sales (above the $10.00 million expected for the XC-750) per year in those years would justify purchasing the larger machine?
Incremental Effects |
||||
Year |
0 |
|||
Sales Revenues |
$ |
|||
Cost of Goods Sold |
$ |
|||
S, G, and A Expenses |
$ |
|||
Depreciation |
$ |
|||
EBIT |
$ |
|||
Taxes at 35% |
$ |
|||
Unlevered Net Income |
$ |
a). Incremental earnings:
Year 0: -1,042,080
Year 1 -10: 542,100
b). Free cash flow:
Year 0: -4,551,360
Year 1: -262,620
Year 2-10: 818,100
Year 11: 720,000
c). NPV of the purchase = 228,000.22
Calculations in the table below:
d). Using the base-case valuation table given above and changing the sales numbers, the best case and worst case NPV's are calculated to be:
Worst-case sale of 7,950,000 - NPV = -2,333,058.82
Best-case sale of 12,050,000 - NPV = 2,789,059.25