In this new era of relatively higher energy prices in Australia,
the rapid restructuring of the more energy-intensive businesses,
driving many to move production abroad. Many cannot manage multiple
changes in costs and have lost the edge that low-cost energy gave
them to remain competitive. It is also driving the restructuring of
investments in key parts of the energy supply sector in a way that
is not largely reflective of an open, competitive market sector. It
is also increasing the cost of living burden on all
Australians.
Electricity and gas prices on the rise between 2007 and 2013
Australian electricity and gas prices both rising more than 100% in
some states.

(Graph Data : Electricity Price index Dec 1980 - Dec 2012
,Electricity Network Regulatory Frameworks, Inquiry Report, Vol 1,
Productivity Commission)
High capital expenditure rates for the networks New South Wales
(NSW) were consequently approved, initially in NSW and followed
shortly after in Queensland, which set off a major electricity
price ratchet in those States.The investment and regulatory
challenge at the time was to forecast the effect on demand for
power of a major escalation of network prices in subdued economic
conditions. The forecasting techniques of old would prove very
unreliable. These are the causes of high energy prices in
Australia.
There are some consequences of High Energy Prices-
- The end of “inelasticity” of electricity
demand - The traditional wisdom in the energy industry was
that electricity use was relatively “inelastic” ,it would not be
influenced by price substantially it was an essential service ,the
consumption growth graph continuously pointed up even when the
consumption trend was down.some challenged the traditional wisdom,
arguing that energy was indeed elastic and that the industry would
see a decline indemand, that prices would continue to be driven up
(due to large fixed costs and lower system load factors) and that
the industry would enter a “death spiral” effect until some base
usage was reached. The subsequent regulated electricity price shock
(there was also a high greenhouse gas mitigation policy part)
demonstrated that demand for energy was elastic –just as for the
other smart and in line with economic theory.This came as a shock
for people working in the electricity industry as many had
neverseen a decline in demand in their entire working lives. It was
new territory and demand forecasting failure was widespread. At the
same time, other policy interventions also contributed to
accelerating these effects for example the heavily subsidised and
policy mandated take-up of solar technologies. This reduced the
revenues but not the costs of networks as they still had to meet
the demand at peak times. The early 2014 heat wave provided an
example, where peak demand reached close to historical highs in
affected states even though overall consumption had been
falling.
- Gas demand also falling - The market prices
for gas are escalating on the east coast in response to a huge
demand for indigenous gas for LNG production and export, driving up
the value of new gas and hoovering up existing low cost of
production gas. Some new price balance can eventually emerge on the
geographic region domestically reflective of costs of production as
the price bubble drives both demand and supply responses. But once
again policy issues are limiting the ability to bring on new
production in some sectors and the network impacts are yet to
materialise. As outlined, investment in network assets comes from
either growth in demand or from increases in prices (or a
combination of both) and high prices are already driving down
demand for gas. The impact on gas use for power generation due to
the combined effects of reducing electricity demand and escalating
gas prices is becoming stark –several gas generators have shut down
or significantly curtailed production.
- The impact on manufacturing
industry-The impacts were also highly predictable
and are still playing out in the economy in terms of generational
industrial restructuring. Again,industrial restructuring is not a
new phenomenon in Australia as during the late 1980s and early
1990s we saw the rapid decline of the textiles, clothing and
footwear industry, once tariff protection was removed. There was a
rapid restructure in terms of lost jobs in the sector and a
shutdown of plants that had been operating for many decades. But it
also lowered the anticipated cost of these items in Australia from
imported equivalents and what remains of the industry has itself
restructured into the value-adding components that can be
competitive.One of the key competitive advantages Australian
industry has enjoyed has been low energy prices.Electricity from
coal was and remains very competitive by world standards.
- The impact on food processing and packaging -
The packaged and processed food sector is also heavily affected and
is now going through the same restructuring as the rag trade, with
consequences for food growers. The energy content and cost is
significant if food has to be processed and put into containers
(glass, steel, plastic), or frozen or has to be cooked and then
packaged –which is much of what is found on supermarket shelves.The
packaged food industry is also more easily replicated than heavy
manufacturing in different countries.As well, brands are more and
more focused at intervals world firm possession.Often it's merely a
case of a world firm shifting production to marginal capability
that already exists in offshore jurisdictions.This trend has
already started and is likely to accelerate as gas prices continue
to rise. The impact on power generation in the Asian regionIn
Malaysia, for example, there is a return from gas to coal-fired
power generation due to the high LNG price impact. This is becoming
a trend in South East Asian manufacturing countries as they seek to
remain competitive with China and other BRIC countries.China itself
continues to build coal-fired power generation every year
equivalent to Australia’s total coal generation capacity.
- The impact on the Australian energy industry -
There are substitution affects that can rapidly distort or
restructure investments, and perceived regulatory and policy driven
risks can materially add to the costs of investments. For example
the concept of using gas to fuel base load (and even mid merit)
power stations has gone from being a robust proposition to being
placed on the shelf for probably the next decade at least (some
modelling indicates a lot of longer) in just a space of 2
years–again through revisions to actual demand impacts from prices
and the impact of the RET to date. Renewable power station
developments, despite policies for their implementation and major
subsidisation, have also largely now stalled andsome coal plants
could be mothballed or run intermittently. High gas prices may also
see an escalation in the use of residential air conditioners for
the winter heating months. These are just some examples of how the
interactions of market forces and various levels of policy
intervention can drive unintended (and often illogical)
consequences.
- The impact on the cost of living - The rapid
escalation of energy prices is also leading to an equally rapid and
worrying growth in residential “energy poverty” –defined as
consumers who will have to apply more than 10% of their income to
pay their energy bills. This burden will eventually also fall on
the public purse and is set to be compounded by the rise in gas
prices in the populous southern states (NSW, Victoria and SA).There
is a need to much better understand the underlying drivers and
trends in energy use in Australia which can only be derived from a
far more granular approach to forecasting than has been adopted to
date and the development of well calibrated economic models. This
will assist both policy development and investment analysis
considerably.