In: Finance
The following are extracted from the financial statements of Frem, Inc., for 2012, 2011, and 2010.
| 
 2012  | 
 2011  | 
 2010  | 
|
| 
 Net sales  | 
 $233,000  | 
 $204,000  | 
|
| 
 Cost of sales  | 
 (124,000)  | 
 (110,000)  | 
|
| 
 Selling and administrative expenses  | 
 (95,000)  | 
 (81,500)  | 
|
| 
 Other income:  | 
|||
| 
 Interest  | 
 (3,700)  | 
 (3,050)  | 
|
| 
 Other  | 
 100  | 
 1,175  | 
|
| 
 Earnings before tax and extraordinary credit  | 
 $ 10,400  | 
 $ 10,625  | 
|
| 
 Provision for income tax  | 
 (4,800)  | 
 (4,740)  | 
|
| 
 Earnings before extraordinary credit  | 
 5,600  | 
 5,885  | 
|
| 
 Extraordinary credit  | 
 -  | 
 1,510  | 
|
| 
 $ 5,600  | 
 $ 7,395  | 
||
| 
 Total assets  | 
 $202,000  | 
 $173,000  | 
 $161,000  | 
| 
 Long-term debt  | 
 24,600  | 
 17,400  | 
 15,200  | 
| 
 Common equity  | 
 123,000  | 
 116,800  | 
 112,800  | 
| 
 Preferred stock  | 
 4,000  | 
 4,000  | 
 4,000  | 
| 
 Preferred dividends  | 
 280  | 
 280  | 
 280  | 
Required:
| 
 a.  | 
 Compute the following ratios for 2012 and 2011.  | 
|
| 
 1.  | 
 Net profit margin  | 
|
| 
 2.  | 
 Total asset turnover  | 
|
| 
 3.  | 
 Return on assets  | 
|
| 
 4.  | 
 Return on investment  | 
|
| 
 5.  | 
 Return on total equity  | 
|
| 
 6.  | 
 Return on common equity  | 
|
| 
 7.  | 
 Gross profit margin  | 
|
| 
 b.  | 
 Discuss the trend in profitability and identify specific causes for the trend.  | 
|
Table showing required ratios
| 1 | Particulars | 2011 | 2012 | 
| PAT | 7395 | 5600 | |
| Net sales | 204000 | 233000 | |
| Net profit margin | 3.63% | 2.40% | |
| 2 | Particulars | 2011 | 2012 | 
| Net sales | 204000 | 233000 | |
| Asset | 173000 | 202000 | |
| Total asset turnover | 1.179191 | 1.153465 | |
| 3&4 | Particulars | 2011 | 2012 | 
| PAT | 7395 | 5600 | |
| Asset | 173000 | 202000 | |
| Return on assets/investment | 4.3% | 2.8% | |
| 5&6 | Particulars | 2011 | 2012 | 
| PAT | 7395 | 5600 | |
| Common equity | 116800 | 123000 | |
| Return on total equity | 6.33% | 4.55% | |
| 7 | Particulars | 2011 | 2012 | 
| Net sales | 204000 | 233000 | |
| COGS | -110000 | -124000 | |
| Gross profit | 94000 | 109000 | |
| Gross margin | 46.08% | 46.78% | 
b)
Statement showing P&L
| Particulars | 2011 | 2012 | % increase | 
| Net sales | 204000 | 233000 | 14.2% | 
| COGS | -110000 | -124000 | 12.7% | 
| Selling and admin expense | -81500 | -95000 | 16.6% | 
| Other income | |||
| Interest | -3050 | -3700 | 21.3% | 
| Others | 1175 | 100 | -91.5% | 
| EBIT | 10625 | 10400 | -2.1% | 
| Provision for income tax | -4740 | -4800 | 1.3% | 
| Earnings before extra ordinary item | 5885 | 5600 | -4.8% | 
| Credit | 1510 | -100.0% | |
| PAT | 7395 | 5600 | -24.3% | 
Items as % of sales
| Net sales | 204000 | 233000 | 
| COGS | -110000 | -124000 | 
| % of sales | 53.9% | 53.2% | 
| Selling and admin expense | -81500 | -95000 | 
| % of sales | 39.95% | 40.77% | 
It is clear that there was abnormal profit during year 2011 as a result there was abnormal profit. Considering expenses as % of sales , they are proportionate to change in sales. Thus one can say that company might have increased in size but not in profitability. Margins are the same