In: Statistics and Probability
2. Using the worksheet, Quality, determine which wing of the company produces higher quality parts: Old Wing
and Job-enriched Wing. Assume Alpha 0.01 round to four decimals.
a. Which statistical analysis should be used to answer this question?
b. What are the null and alternative hypotheses?
c. Conduct the appropriate statistical analysis on Excel or StatCrunch. Provide a copy of your output.
d. Using your output, what is the p-value?
e. Using your output, what is the test statistic?
f. What is your decision?
g. Based on your decision, what is your conclusion?
3. Based on the analyses conducted in Questions #1 and #2, what conclusion do you reach about the success of the
Job Enrichment program? Support your answer with your analyses and decisions.
Quality Sheet below:
Old Wing | Job-Enriched Wing |
Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | Not Defective |
Defective | Not Defective |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Not Defective | |
Defective |
From the given data, we calculate the frequency of Defective and Non-Defective for both Wings
Old Wing |
Job-Enriched Wing |
|
Defective |
10 |
11 |
Not Defective |
69 |
112 |
Total |
79 |
123 |
Group 1 (Old Wing)
Proportion of Defective Parts (p1) = 10/79 = 0.127
n1 = 79
Group 2 (Job-Enriched Wing)
Proportion of Defective Parts (p2) = 11/123 = 0.089
n2 = 123
pc = (n1*p1 + n2*p2)/(n1+n2) = 0.104
Standard Error (SE) = (pc*(1-pc)/n1 + pc*(1-pc)/n2 )1/2 = 0.044
Alpha = 0.05
a)
We will be using one tailed z test of diff of population proportions
b)
Null and Alternate Hypothesis
H0: p1 = p2 (The Proportion of defective parts is same for both wings)
Ha: p1 > p2 (The Proportion of defective parts for Old 1 is greater than that of Job-Enriched Wing)
c)
I have used excel but there is no tool to do the hypothesis test. Instead I have calculated values as shown above
d)
Test Statistic
Z = (p1-p2)/SE = 0.844
p-value = 1- NORM.S.DIST(0.844,TRUE) = 0.1993
e)
Test Statistic
Z = (p1-p2)/SE = 0.844
f)
Result
Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, the data is not statistically significant and we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
g)
The Proportion of defective parts is same for both wings
Question 3 cannot be answered without 1.