Question

In: Psychology

Identify the fallacy of failed induction in the following argument: "It is overly pessimistic to think...

Identify the fallacy of failed induction in the following argument:

"It is overly pessimistic to think that a global nuclear war would destroy all human life on Earth. The well-known political commentator Glen Beck has presented substantial evidence for this view."

Solutions

Expert Solution

Fallacies of failed induction usually have the following characteristics:

  1. Quick to generalize
  2. Support a false cause
  3. An appeal to ignorance
  4. An appeal to unqualified authority

Analysis:

  1. It is overly pessimistic to think that a global nuclear war would destroy all human life on Earth. -- This is the conclusion
  2. The well-known political commentator Glen Beck has presented substantial evidence for this view. -- This is the argument

First, the conclusion itself is a generalization. We are incapable of knowing the scale at which destruction might take place if there is a global war.

Second, Glenn Beck is a conservative political commentator who provide opinions on theories. He does not have any empirical evidence that has been proven with years of research. He might have a sample set with which he has come to to this conclusion.

In essence, the conclusion is generalized, the authority in the argument is unqualified and therefore it is a fallacy of failed induction.


Related Solutions

Any argument that depends on an ambiguity commits the fallacy of equivocation the fallacy of begging...
Any argument that depends on an ambiguity commits the fallacy of equivocation the fallacy of begging the question the fallacy of appealing to ignorance the gambler's fallacy none of the above As a contestant on a game show you win the following prize. You are allowed to blindly choose one card from a regular deck. If you get a heart, you win $29; otherwise you win $13. The expected payoff of this opportunity is: $14 $15 $16 $17 $18 You...
This argument or definition most clearly illustrates which fallacy?
 This argument or definition most clearly illustrates which fallacy? (For this problem, accept the italicized part as factually true. The fallacy occurs with what this argument does with the facts.) On a full tank of gasoline for each car, on the same roadway under the same conditions, and being driven at the same speed by the same driver, car A goes 80 miles farther than does car B. Therefore, car A is more fuel efficient. Ad hominem Faulty appeal to tradition Ad populum Ad astra False infinitum Begging...
This argument or definition most clearly illustrates which fallacy?
 This argument or definition most clearly illustrates which fallacy? This fallacy occurs when we inject personality into something that doesn't involve personality, or when we exaggerate personality's role or relevance when personality isn't relevant to the degree claimed. Begging the question Faulty appeal to tradition Slippery slope Faulty appeal to authority Bandwagon Ad hominem Strawman
The following passage contains an argument that commits at least one informal fallacy. Name the type...
The following passage contains an argument that commits at least one informal fallacy. Name the type of fallacy committed and explain why the passage is an example of that type. That biscotti ought to be good—I used only the best ingredients in it.
Which fallacy is most obvioulsy committed in the following argument? America—Love it or leave it! Multiple...
Which fallacy is most obvioulsy committed in the following argument? America—Love it or leave it! Multiple Choice False dilemma Appeal to ignorance Ad hominem Appeal to unqualified authority Complex question Appeal to the nation
What test does this argument fail? What fallacy does the argument contain? Seventy-three percent of the...
What test does this argument fail? What fallacy does the argument contain? Seventy-three percent of the people surveyed said that they wanted universal health care coverage. Fifty-four percent said that they were worried about the cost of the program or the quality of the care that would be provided. Therefore, the American people are opposed to the President’s health care reform legislation
Identify the fallacies of insufficient evidence in the following arguments. If no fallacy is committed, write...
Identify the fallacies of insufficient evidence in the following arguments. If no fallacy is committed, write “no fallacy. 9. Either you support preferential treatment for disadvantaged minorities in university admissions, or you’re a racist. But surely, you’re not a racist. Therefore, you support preferential treatment for disadvantaged minorities in university admissions. 11. Students have asked that we extend residence hall visitation hours by one hour on Friday and Saturday nights. This request will have to be denied. If we give...
Instructions: Identify the fallacy of relevance that appears in the following passage. Either you accept that...
Instructions: Identify the fallacy of relevance that appears in the following passage. Either you accept that this legislation is good, or we will vote you out of office. The appeal to emotion The red herring The straw man The attack on the person The appeal to force Missing the point (irrelevant conclusion)
Introduction to Logic. Section One: Identify the following fallacies of Relevance and explain how the fallacy...
Introduction to Logic. Section One: Identify the following fallacies of Relevance and explain how the fallacy is committed. 1. These poor children have no parents to give them Christmas presents, cook them Christmas Dinner, or to give them Christmas candy. Without help they will be out on the street homeless, cold, and desperate .If you can you should give money to our charity to help prevent this horrible human tragedy.    2. Richard Cheney thought it was appropriate to ask...
What fallacy you have personally used or seen in an argument how will critical thinking skills...
What fallacy you have personally used or seen in an argument how will critical thinking skills make you less likely to be influenced by arguments that are based on fallacies and faulty reasoning
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT