Question

In: Psychology

If you were defending the Cherokee and other native nations before the U.S. Supreme Court in...

If you were defending the Cherokee and other native nations before the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1830s, what arguments would you make? If you were supporting Indian removal, what arguments would you make?

Solutions

Expert Solution

One of the most important things about America is that it’s a country of the settlers. It’s the Native Americans who lived and protected the land for thousands of years. This would mean that the settlers would have respected the integrity of the Native Americans by not disturbing their lands. The greedy nature of the Europeans not just in America but all over the world has left most of the people lose their land, resources and life. The same thing happened to the Native Americans who trusted that the Europeans came for trade and not to invade them. betrayal was one of the key words that the Europeans used all over the world. America was a vast country with more vacant lands but the Europeans forced the Native Americans out of their lands that they used for their living. It’s by all means and today’s standards is wrong and it should have been prevented.

Thank you for the question. Please rate if you like the answer.


Related Solutions

According to the U.S. Supreme Court, what is not to be considered "community" under the current...
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, what is not to be considered "community" under the current test for determining if speech is obscene?
In what ways was the U.S Supreme Court a party to the repression of African American...
In what ways was the U.S Supreme Court a party to the repression of African American lives and politics in the 1870s, 80s, and 90s? 400 words
Research Dothard v. Rawlinson and discuss the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. Do you agree...
Research Dothard v. Rawlinson and discuss the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. Do you agree with their reasoning?
In Griswold v. Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that “specific guarantees in the Bill of...
In Griswold v. Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that “specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance.” 1. Discuss the meaning and implications of Griswold’s penumbras and emanations 2. Describe the legal basis for an unenumerated right that might be located within these purported constitutional regions.
In Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court decided...
In Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court decided a case in which landowners challenged the power of a city in Connecticut to take their property for redevelopment. The redevelopment plan did not contemplate that all of the land would be open to the public. Parts would be privately developed. The plaintiffs alleged that the taking was unconstitutional because it was not for a public purpose. The Supreme Court rejected this claim. Use...
Why did the Supreme Court find that CONs were illegal? certificate of needs
Why did the Supreme Court find that CONs were illegal? certificate of needs
Why might the U.S. Supreme Court have said that LGBT marriage is a liberty that should...
Why might the U.S. Supreme Court have said that LGBT marriage is a liberty that should be protected by due process of law?
In the Brown decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Decided that segregated public schools violated the 14th...
In the Brown decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Decided that segregated public schools violated the 14th Amendment. Explain their reasoning.
True or False--- In the Hartford Fire Insurance Co. case, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that...
True or False--- In the Hartford Fire Insurance Co. case, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that it could not assert jurisdiction over European companies in competition matters unless the companies had a direct physical presence in a U.S. state.
14 ) In U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that the age, residency,...
14 ) In U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that the age, residency, and citizenship requirements set forth in the Constitution were a complete statement of Congressional eligibility standards and that the only way to add any eligibility requirements would be through a constitutional amendment. True or False 15) Each state is given a number of Electoral College votes equal to its combined number of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate. True or...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT