Question

Are states still the most important actors in international Relations? Why or Why not?

Answer 1

The state plays the leading role in international relations in the conventional understanding. Nevertheless, a lot of international organizations were founded after the World War, with the growth of communications technology, the deepening of international division of labor and the expansion of global trade. Because of globalization, the international environment has changed. Communicating with each other is easier for states that have a major influence on international politics, economy, military, and culture. The growing number of these organizations coincides with the growing levels of political, economic, military and cultural transactions between individuals

These non-state actors question the understanding of the "state-centric." Therefore, three parts will be used in this essay to address whether the state is still the most important player in international relations. First, it will refer to two hypotheses about the role played by the state in contemporary international relations. It will then give an account as to whether the state's role in international relations will be replaced as a result of globalization. Finally, the role of the state in the international economy, politics and environment will be demonstrated.

There are two hypotheses that prevail over the state's position in international relations. Neorealism stresses that in the international arena the state plays the most important role. The state has sovereign power, on the one hand, to ensure domestic security. On the other hand, in international relations, neorealism also emphasizes the state's influence on the economy. Neoliberalism not only suggests that the state is the main body of action in the international system, it also affirms the role of non-state organizations such as international organizations, transnational organizations and other social organizations.